Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 18;34(2):237-241.
doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1852835.

Effect of subcutaneous tissue depth on outcomes of kidney transplantation

Affiliations

Effect of subcutaneous tissue depth on outcomes of kidney transplantation

Richard Ruiz et al. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). .

Abstract

Although post-kidney transplant (KT) wound complications are associated with elevated body mass index (BMI), BMI is not an accurate surrogate of obesity. On the other hand, subcutaneous depth (SQD) measurement is a direct marker of truncal obesity. We examined outcomes of differing intraoperative SQD measurements in 113 KT-only recipients over 20 months. Recipients' median age was 51 years; median BMI, 28 kg/m2; and mean SQD, 2.9 cm. Patients were stratified into groups of SQD ≤2.5 cm, >2.5-5 cm, and >5 cm. An SQD of >2.5 to 5 cm correlated with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 (obesity) and an SQD >5 cm correlated with a BMI >35 kg/m2 (severe obesity). Degree of SQD was not associated with more frequent technical complications such as fascial dehiscence, lymphocele formation, renal artery thrombosis/stenosis, urine leak, or ureteral stenosis. However, an SQD >2.5 cm was a risk factor for requiring a wound vacuum-assisted closure device. There was no difference in graft or patient survival among the three SQD groups. Obesity, as measured directly by SQD, was not associated with increased technical complications or poor outcomes after KT. As expected, there was a higher incidence of wound complications in the higher SQD groups requiring intervention.

Keywords: abdominal fat; kidney transplantation; nephrology; obesity; postoperative complication; wound vacuum-assisted closure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Subcutaneous depth measurements from the fascia to skin level in a kidney transplant recipient, measured as 6.5 cm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Kidney graft survival and (b) patient survival between groups: subcutaneous depth ≤2.5 cm, >2.5 to 5 cm, and >5 cm.

References

    1. Samhan M, Sinan T, Al-Mousawi M.. Vascular complications in renal recipients. Transplant Proc. 1999;31(8):3227–3228. doi:10.1016/S0041-1345(99)00703-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassiri A, Simforoosh N, Gholamrezaie HR.. Ureteral complications in 1100 consecutive renal transplants. Transplant Proc. 2000;32(3):578–579. doi:10.1016/S0041-1345(00)00897-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fockens MM, Alberts VP, Bemelman FJ, van der Pant KA, Idu MM.. Wound morbidity after kidney transplant. Prog Transpl. 2015;25(1):45–48. doi:10.7182/pit2015812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Røine E, Bjørk IT, Oyen O.. Targeting risk factors for impaired wound healing and wound complications after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(7):2542–2546. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopau K, Syamken K, Rubenwolf P, Riedmiller H, Wanner C.. Impact of mycophenolate mofetil on wound complications and lymphoceles after kidney transplantation. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2010;33(1):52–59. doi:10.1159/000289573. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources