Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 7;27(4):578-600.
doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734981. eCollection 2020.

An exploration of perceived coercion into psychological assessment and treatment within a low secure forensic mental health service

Cassandra Simms-Sawyers  1 , Helen Miles  1   2 , Joel Harvey  1
Affiliations

An exploration of perceived coercion into psychological assessment and treatment within a low secure forensic mental health service

Cassandra Simms-Sawyers et al. Psychiatr Psychol Law. .

Abstract

Psychologists working within forensic mental health (FMH) services face challenges around supporting clients' informed consent when engaging in psychological assessment and treatment. Given that there is little research in this area, this qualitative study interviewed ten forensic inpatients from a low secure FMH service, to determine the impact of any perceived coercion to engage with psychologists. Interviews were transcribed and subject to Thematic Analysis. Three over-arching themes emerged from the analysis: 'Awareness of Coercive Power', 'Experiencing and Responding to Coercion' and 'Psychological Treatment is Helpful, But…'. Participants perceived coercion to engage with psychologists. Perceived coercion led to psychological distress, wanting to resist, and superficial engagement. Despite this, therapeutic alliance was established with the psychologist but the quality of the therapeutic alliance was compromised. The findings have implications for psychologists working in FMH services. Suggestions for reducing perceived coercion and future directions for research are discussed.

Keywords: coercion; forensic mental health; informed consent; power; psychological assessment; psychological treatment; therapeutic alliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Thematic map of overarching themes and sub-themes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adshead, G., & Brown, C. (2003). Ethical issues in forensic mental health research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    1. Appelbaum, P.S. (1985). Empirical assessment of innovation in the law of civil commitment: A critique. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 13(6), 304–309. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.1985.tb00954.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker, E. (2003). Service-user views on a low secure psychiatric ward. Clinical Psychology, 25, 11–13.
    1. Baker, R., & Moore, C. (2006). Working in forensic mental health settings. In: What is clinical psychology? (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Barnao, M., Ward, T., & Casey, S. (2015). Looking beyond the illness: Forensic service users’ perceptions of rehabilitation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(6), 1025–1045. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources