Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021;11(2):85-91.
doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00443-8. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Spontaneous Versus Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Affiliations
Review

Spontaneous Versus Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Tayyba Naz Aslam et al. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review clinical evidence on whether or not to allow mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to breathe spontaneously.

Recent findings: Observational data (LUNG SAFE study) indicate that mechanical ventilation allowing for spontaneous breathing (SB) is associated with more ventilator-free days and a shorter stay in the intensive care unit without any effect on hospital mortality. A paediatric trial, comparing airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and low-tidal volume ventilation, showed an increase in mortality in the APRV group. Conversely, in an unpublished trial comparing SB and controlled ventilation (NCT01862016), the authors concluded that SB is feasible but did not improve outcomes in ARDS patients.

Summary: A paucity of clinical trial data continues to prevent firm guidance on if or when to allow SB during mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS. No published large randomised controlled trial exists to inform practice about the benefits and harms of either mode.

Keywords: ALI; ARDS; Acute lung injury; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Mechanical ventilation; Spontaneous ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestNone of the authors has any potential conflicts of interest to disclose

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–2533. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laffey JG, Pham T, Bellani G. Continued under-recognition of acute respiratory distress syndrome after the Berlin definition: what is the solution? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23(1):10–17. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000381. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown SM, Wilson EL, Presson AP, Dinglas VD, Greene T, Hopkins RO, et al. Understanding patient outcomes after acute respiratory distress syndrome: identifying subtypes of physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes. Thorax. 2017;72(12):1094–1103. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: advances in diagnosis and treatment. Jama. 2018;319(7):698–710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources