Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Feb 18:2021:8839897.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8839897. eCollection 2021.

Inflation Pressure in Side Branch during Modified Jailed Balloon Technique Does Not Affect Side Branch Outcomes

Affiliations
Observational Study

Inflation Pressure in Side Branch during Modified Jailed Balloon Technique Does Not Affect Side Branch Outcomes

Tetsuya Nomura et al. J Interv Cardiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the optimal jailed balloon inflation in the side branch during the modified jailed balloon technique for bifurcated lesions.

Background: The modified jailed balloon technique is one of the effective techniques to minimize the emergence of side branch (SB) compromise by preventing plaque or carina shifting during a single stent strategy in the main vessel with provisional SB treatment. However, there are no detailed studies on the method of optimal jailed balloon inflation.

Methods: We analyzed 51 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcated lesions with a modified jailed balloon technique between September 2018 and December 2020. These 51 patients were divided into two groups according to the magnitude of inflation pressure of the jailed balloon: a higher pressure (HP) group and lower pressure (LP) group.

Results: No significant differences in procedural outcomes were observed between the two groups. The findings of SB compromise were relatively common with our procedure (30.0% in the HP group; 33.3% in the LP group). The patterns of SB compromise such as dissection or stenosis increase were observed at similar frequencies between them. In particular, SB dissection was noted in the SB lesion with some plaque burden, irrespective of the magnitude of the jailed balloon inflation pressure. Univariate analysis showed that calcification in the main vessel and SB lesion length was significantly associated with SB compromise. Finally, all PCI procedures were successfully completed without any provisional stent deployment in SB.

Conclusions: We speculate that lesion characteristics rather than the PCI procedural factors may be critical determinants to cause SB compromise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A case of stenosis increase in the SB ostium after the modified jailed balloon technique. (a) A control angiographic image of the targeted bifurcated lesion in the mid-LAD artery. (b) DES deployment simultaneously with 1.5 mm jailed balloon inflation in SB. (c) After the modified jailed balloon technique, arterial dissection developed in the SB ostium. (d) Final angiography with stenosis increase in the SB ostium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A case of severe dissection in the SB ostium after the modified jailed balloon technique. (a) A control angiographic image of the targeted bifurcated lesion in the mid-LAD artery. (b) DES deployment simultaneously with 2.0 mm jailed balloon inflation in SB. (c) Recrossed guidewire advancement in the dissected lumen of SB. (d) Extrastent balloon dilatation with a 1.5 mm balloon to compress the dissected lumen. (e) Successful guidewire passage in SB with limited blood flow. (f) Vessel fenestration at the lesion of hematoma with a cutting balloon. (g) POT with a 3.0 mm noncompliant balloon catheter. (h) Final angiography with favorable blood flow both in MV and SB.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fischman D. L., Savage M. P., Leon M. B., et al. Fate of lesion-related side branches after coronary artery stenting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1993;22(6):1641–1646. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90589-s. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen J., Galløe A., Lassen J., et al. Safety in simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. The nordic bifurcation study 14-month follow-up results. EuroIntervention. 2008;4(2):229–233. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i2a41. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lassen J. F., Holm N. R., Stankovic G., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European bifurcation club meetings. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(5):545–560. doi: 10.4244/eijv10i5a97. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaudhry E. C., Dauerman K. P., Sarnoski C. L., Thomas C. S., Dauerman H. L. Percutaneous coronary intervention for major bifurcation lesions using the simple approach: risk of myocardial infarction. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2007;24(1):7–13. doi: 10.1007/s11239-006-0004-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louvard Y., Lefevre T., Morice M. C. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease. Heart. 2004;90(6):713–722. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2002.007682. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types