Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 18:12:519840.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.519840. eCollection 2021.

Disentangling ADHD's Presentation-Related Decision-Making-A Meta-Analytic Approach on Predominant Presentations

Marcel Schulze  1 , David Coghill  2   3   4 , Silke Lux  1 , Alexandra Philipsen  1
Affiliations

Disentangling ADHD's Presentation-Related Decision-Making-A Meta-Analytic Approach on Predominant Presentations

Marcel Schulze et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Deficient decision-making (DM) in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is marked by altered reward sensitivity, higher risk taking, and aberrant reinforcement learning. Previous meta-analysis aggregate findings for the ADHD combined presentation (ADHD-C) mostly, while the ADHD predominantly inattentive presentation (ADHD-I) and the predominantly hyperactive/impulsive presentation (ADHD-H) were not disentangled. The objectives of the current meta-analysis were to aggregate findings from DM for each presentation separately. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed (Medline) and Web of Science Database took place using the keywords "ADHD," "attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder," "decision-making," "risk-taking," "reinforcement learning," and "risky." Random-effects models based on correlational effect-sizes were conducted. Heterogeneity analysis and sensitivity/outlier analysis were performed, and publication biases were assessed with funnel-plots and the egger intercept. Results: Of 1,240 candidate articles, seven fulfilled criteria for analysis of ADHD-C (N = 193), seven for ADHD-I (N = 256), and eight for ADHD-H (N = 231). Moderate effect-size were found for ADHD-C (r = 0.34; p = 0.0001; 95% CI = [0.19, 0.49]). Small effect-sizes were found for ADHD-I (r = 0.09; p = 0.0001; 95% CI = [0.008, 0.25]) and for ADHD-H (r = 0.1; p = 0.0001; 95% CI = [-0.012, 0.32]). Heterogeneity was moderate for ADHD-H. Sensitivity analyses show robustness of the analysis, and no outliers were detected. No publication bias was evident. Conclusion: This is the first study that uses a meta-analytic approach to investigate the relationship between the different presentations of ADHD separately. These findings provide first evidence of lesser pronounced impairment in DM for ADHD-I and ADHD-I compared to ADHD-C. While the exact factors remain elusive, the current study can be considered as a starting point to reveal the relationship of ADHD presentations and DM more detailed.

Keywords: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder; decision making; inattention and hyperactivity; meta-analysis; risk behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prisma flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the effect-sizes and 95% confidence intervals for ADHD-combined presentation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the effect-sizes and 95% confidence intervals for ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsive-presentation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the effect-sizes and 95% confidence intervals for ADHD-inattention-presentation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results of leave-one-out analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition . Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; (2013).
    1. LeRoy A, Jacova C, Young C. Neuropsychological performance patterns of adult ADHD subtypes. J Attent Disord. (2019) 23:1136–47. 10.1177/1087054718773927 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nigg JT, Blaskey LG, Huang-Pollock CL, Rappley MD. Neuropsychological executive functions and DSM-IV ADHD subtypes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2002) 41:59–66. 10.1097/00004583-200201000-00012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geurts HM, van der Oord S, Crone EA. Hot and cool aspects of cognitive control in children with ADHD: decision-making and inhibition. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2006) 34:813–24. 10.1007/s10802-006-9059-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coghill DR, Seth S, Matthews K. A comprehensive assessment of memory, delay aversion, timing, inhibition, decision making and variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: advancing beyond the three-pathway models. Psychol Med. (2014) 44:1989–2001. 10.1017/S0033291713002547 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources