Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 19:2021:6682189.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6682189. eCollection 2021.

Root and Root Canal Morphology Classification Systems

Affiliations
Review

Root and Root Canal Morphology Classification Systems

Mohmed Isaqali Karobari et al. Int J Dent. .

Abstract

Introduction: While there are many root morphology classification systems with their own distinct advantages, there are many shortcomings that come along with each system.

Objectives: The aim of this review was to compare the various root and root canal morphology classifications, their advantages, limitations, and clinical and research implications. Data Sources and Selection. An extensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus to identify the published data on root and root canal classification systems published until 1 May 2020 using keywords, root canal classification system, classification systems for root canals, and root morphology. The related literature was reviewed and then summarized. Data Synthesis. Several studies have analysed and detailed root and root canal classifications and further added new subsystems, works of Weine et al. (1969) and Vertucci et al. (1974). Besides, Sert and Bayirli (2004) added supplementary types to Vertucci's classification system. A new classification was most recently introduced by Ahmed et al. (2017) involving the use of codes for tooth numbering, number of roots, and canal configuration.

Conclusions: Weine et al. classified only single-rooted teeth, without considering multirooted teeth and complex configurations. Vertucci's classification included complex configurations, with Sert and Bayirli adding further complex supplemental types. Ahmed et al.'s classification simplifies classifying root and canal morphology while overcoming the limitations of several previous classification systems making it beneficial for implementation in dental schools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Weine's classification of root canal morphology from type I to type IV.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vertucci's classification of root canal morphology from type I to type VIII.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Supplemental configuration types to Vertucci's classification system for root canal morphology as suggested by Sert and Bayirli.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Classification of root and root canal morphology in permanent dentition by Ahmed et al.

References

    1. Vertucci F. J. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics. 2005;10(1):3–29.
    1. Monsarrat P., Arcaute B., Peters O. A., et al. Interrelationships in the variability of root canal anatomy among the permanent teeth: a full-mouth approach by cone-beam CT. PLos One. 2016;11(10):1–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weine F. S., Healey H. J., Gerstein H., Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1969;28(3):419–425. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(69)90237-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weine F. S. In: Endodontic Therapy. weine F., editor. Louis, MI, USA: C. V. Mosby; 1982.
    1. Vertucci F., Seelig A., Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1974;38(3):456–464. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(74)90374-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources