Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12;9(2):e3421.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003421. eCollection 2021 Feb.

The Impact of Progestin-only Contraception on Adolescents with Macromastia

Affiliations

The Impact of Progestin-only Contraception on Adolescents with Macromastia

Laura C Nuzzi et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Progestin-only contraception has become increasingly popular among adolescents. However, patients, parents, and providers share concerns regarding the potential impact that progestin-only contraception may have on breast growth. We sought to explore the impact of progestin-only contraception on breast hypertrophy and symptomatology in adolescents with macromastia.

Methods: Patients between the ages of 12 and 21 years undergoing reduction mammaplasty were prospectively assessed for baseline and postoperative breast symptomatology and medication use. The medical records of female controls within the same age range were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: A total of 378 participants with macromastia and 378 controls were included in analyses. A higher proportion of controls used progestin-only methods compared with participants with macromastia (28.0% versus 5.3%, P < 0.001). The most commonly prescribed methods were the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection (31.0%), levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine device (31.0%), and subdermal implant (26.2%). Patients with macromastia who used progestin-only contraception had a greater amount of breast tissue resected during reduction mammaplasty (P = 0.04), reported greater musculoskeletal pain (P = 0.008), and were roughly 500% more likely to experience breast pain (odds ratio, 4.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-15.47; P = 0.005) than those with macromastia who never used hormonal contraception.

Conclusions: Adolescents with macromastia who use progestin-only contraception may have greater breast hypertrophy and worse breast and musculoskeletal pain. When appropriate, providers may wish to consider other contraception methods for patients who are at-risk for breast hypertrophy or those who suffer from macromastia-related symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abma JC, Martinez GM. Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the United States, 2011–2015. Natl Health Stat Report. 2017;104:1–23. - PubMed
    1. Jones RK. Beyond Birth Control: The Overlooked Benefits of Oral Contraceptive Pills. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2011. Available at https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/beyond-birth-c.... Accessed April 16, 2020.
    1. Bahamondes L, Valeria Bahamondes M, Shulman LP. Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal and intrauterine reversible contraceptive methods. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:640–651. - PubMed
    1. Iversen L, Sivasubramaniam S, Lee AJ, et al. . Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners’ oral contraception study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:580.e1–580.e9. - PubMed
    1. Lidegaard Ø, Løkkegaard E, Svendsen AL, et al. . Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study. BMJ. 2009;339:b2890. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources