The Impact of Progestin-only Contraception on Adolescents with Macromastia
- PMID: 33680669
- PMCID: PMC7929442
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003421
The Impact of Progestin-only Contraception on Adolescents with Macromastia
Abstract
Progestin-only contraception has become increasingly popular among adolescents. However, patients, parents, and providers share concerns regarding the potential impact that progestin-only contraception may have on breast growth. We sought to explore the impact of progestin-only contraception on breast hypertrophy and symptomatology in adolescents with macromastia.
Methods: Patients between the ages of 12 and 21 years undergoing reduction mammaplasty were prospectively assessed for baseline and postoperative breast symptomatology and medication use. The medical records of female controls within the same age range were retrospectively reviewed.
Results: A total of 378 participants with macromastia and 378 controls were included in analyses. A higher proportion of controls used progestin-only methods compared with participants with macromastia (28.0% versus 5.3%, P < 0.001). The most commonly prescribed methods were the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection (31.0%), levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine device (31.0%), and subdermal implant (26.2%). Patients with macromastia who used progestin-only contraception had a greater amount of breast tissue resected during reduction mammaplasty (P = 0.04), reported greater musculoskeletal pain (P = 0.008), and were roughly 500% more likely to experience breast pain (odds ratio, 4.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-15.47; P = 0.005) than those with macromastia who never used hormonal contraception.
Conclusions: Adolescents with macromastia who use progestin-only contraception may have greater breast hypertrophy and worse breast and musculoskeletal pain. When appropriate, providers may wish to consider other contraception methods for patients who are at-risk for breast hypertrophy or those who suffer from macromastia-related symptoms.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Similar articles
-
The Impact of Combined Oral Contraceptives on Adolescents with Macromastia.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):731-738. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009513. Epub 2022 Jul 22. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 35862103
-
The impact of macromastia on adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):e339-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3869. Epub 2012 Jul 16. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22802601
-
The Effect of Reduction Mammaplasty on Quality of Life in Adolescents With Macromastia.Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5):e20171103. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1103. Epub 2017 Oct 6. Pediatrics. 2017. PMID: 28986442
-
The relationship between progestin hormonal contraception and depression: a systematic review.Contraception. 2018 Jun;97(6):478-489. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 29496297
-
Hormonal contraception and lactation.J Hum Lact. 1996 Dec;12(4):315-8. doi: 10.1177/089033449601200419. J Hum Lact. 1996. PMID: 9025449 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of Reduction Mammaplasty in Adolescents vs Average-Age Patients: A 3-Year Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Ochsner J. 2024 Spring;24(1):14-21. doi: 10.31486/toj.23.0079. Ochsner J. 2024. PMID: 38510229 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abma JC, Martinez GM. Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the United States, 2011–2015. Natl Health Stat Report. 2017;104:1–23. - PubMed
-
- Jones RK. Beyond Birth Control: The Overlooked Benefits of Oral Contraceptive Pills. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2011. Available at https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/beyond-birth-c.... Accessed April 16, 2020.
-
- Bahamondes L, Valeria Bahamondes M, Shulman LP. Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal and intrauterine reversible contraceptive methods. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:640–651. - PubMed
-
- Iversen L, Sivasubramaniam S, Lee AJ, et al. . Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners’ oral contraception study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:580.e1–580.e9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources