Multiple U-Net-Based Automatic Segmentations and Radiomics Feature Stability on Ultrasound Images for Patients With Ovarian Cancer
- PMID: 33680934
- PMCID: PMC7930567
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.614201
Multiple U-Net-Based Automatic Segmentations and Radiomics Feature Stability on Ultrasound Images for Patients With Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Few studies have reported the reproducibility and stability of ultrasound (US) images based radiomics features obtained from automatic segmentation in oncology. The purpose of this study is to study the accuracy of automatic segmentation algorithms based on multiple U-net models and their effects on radiomics features from US images for patients with ovarian cancer. A total of 469 US images from 127 patients were collected and randomly divided into three groups: training sets (353 images), validation sets (23 images), and test sets (93 images) for automatic segmentation models building. Manual segmentation of target volumes was delineated as ground truth. Automatic segmentations were conducted with U-net, U-net++, U-net with Resnet as the backbone (U-net with Resnet), and CE-Net. A python 3.7.0 and package Pyradiomics 2.2.0 were used to extract radiomic features from the segmented target volumes. The accuracy of automatic segmentations was evaluated by Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and average surface distance (ASD). The reliability of radiomics features were evaluated by Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). CE-Net and U-net with Resnet outperformed U-net and U-net++ in accuracy performance by achieving a DSC, JSC, and ASD of 0.87, 0.79, 8.54, and 0.86, 0.78, 10.00, respectively. A total of 97 features were extracted from the delineated target volumes. The average Pearson correlation was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91), and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92) for U-net++, U-net, U-net with Resnet, and CE-Net, respectively. The average ICC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.90), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91) for U-net++, U-net, U-net with Resnet, and CE-Net, respectively. CE-Net based segmentation achieved the best radiomics reliability. In conclusion, U-net based automatic segmentation was accurate enough to delineate the target volumes on US images for patients with ovarian cancer. Radiomics features extracted from automatic segmented targets showed good reproducibility and for reliability further radiomics investigations.
Keywords: U-net; automatic segmentation; ovarian cancer; radiomics; ultrasound images.
Copyright © 2021 Jin, Zhu, Zhang, Ai, Zhang, Teng, Xie and Jin.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
The Accuracy and Radiomics Feature Effects of Multiple U-net-Based Automatic Segmentation Models for Transvaginal Ultrasound Images of Cervical Cancer.J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):983-992. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00620-z. Epub 2022 Mar 30. J Digit Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35355160 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Effects of Automatic Segmentations on Preoperative Lymph Node Status Prediction Models With Ultrasound Radiomics for Patients With Early Stage Cervical Cancer.Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221099396. doi: 10.1177/15330338221099396. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022. PMID: 35522305 Free PMC article.
-
CNN-based automatic segmentations and radiomics feature reliability on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for renal tumors.Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 2;13:1166988. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1166988. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37333811 Free PMC article.
-
Radiomics feature reliability assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient: a systematic review.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Oct;11(10):4431-4460. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-86. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021. PMID: 34603997 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep Learning With Radiomics for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Challenges and Potential.Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 17;12:773840. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.773840. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35251962 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Application of radiomics in precision prediction of diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Mar;41(3):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01352-4. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Jpn J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36260211 Review.
-
The Accuracy and Radiomics Feature Effects of Multiple U-net-Based Automatic Segmentation Models for Transvaginal Ultrasound Images of Cervical Cancer.J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):983-992. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00620-z. Epub 2022 Mar 30. J Digit Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35355160 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Machine Learning and Radiomics Applications in Esophageal Cancers Using Non-Invasive Imaging Methods-A Critical Review of Literature.Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 19;13(10):2469. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102469. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34069367 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative analysis of automatic segmentation of esophageal cancer using 3D Res-UNet on conventional and 40-keV virtual mono-energetic CT Images: a retrospective study.PeerJ. 2023 Jul 17;11:e15707. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15707. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37483982 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Performance Analysis of Segmentation and Classification of CT-Scanned Ovarian Tumours Using U-Net and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;13(13):2282. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132282. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37443676 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources