Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 19:9:613787.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.613787. eCollection 2021.

Bioactive Materials for Soft Tissue Repair

Affiliations
Review

Bioactive Materials for Soft Tissue Repair

Elisa Mazzoni et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Over the past decades, age-related pathologies have increased abreast the aging population worldwide. The increased age of the population indicates that new tools, such as biomaterials/scaffolds for damaged tissues, which display high efficiency, effectively and in a limited period of time, for the regeneration of the body's tissue are needed. Indeed, scaffolds can be used as templates for three-dimensional tissue growth in order to promote the tissue healing stimulating the body's own regenerative mechanisms. In tissue engineering, several types of biomaterials are employed, such as bioceramics including calcium phosphates, bioactive glasses, and glass-ceramics. These scaffolds seem to have a high potential as biomaterials in regenerative medicine. In addition, in conjunction with other materials, such as polymers, ceramic scaffolds may be used to manufacture composite scaffolds characterized by high biocompatibility, mechanical efficiency and load-bearing capabilities that render these biomaterials suitable for regenerative medicine applications. Usually, bioceramics have been used to repair hard tissues, such as bone and dental defects. More recently, in the field of soft tissue engineering, this form of scaffold has also shown promising applications. Indeed, soft tissues are continuously exposed to damages, such as burns or mechanical traumas, tumors and degenerative pathology, and, thereby, thousands of people need remedial interventions such as biomaterials-based therapies. It is known that scaffolds can affect the ability to bind, proliferate and differentiate cells similar to those of autologous tissues. Therefore, it is important to investigate the interaction between bioceramics and somatic/stem cells derived from soft tissues in order to promote tissue healing. Biomimetic scaffolds are frequently employed as drug-delivery system using several therapeutic molecules to increase their biological performance, leading to ultimate products with innovative functionalities. This review provides an overview of essential requirements for soft tissue engineering biomaterials. Data on recent progresses of porous bioceramics and composites for tissue repair are also presented.

Keywords: bioceramic; bioglasses; biomimetic; delivery; soft tissue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bioactive scaffolds applications in regenerative medicine. It has been demonstrated that these materials are suitable candidates for treating soft tissue damage including lung, ligament, tendon, epithelial, cardiac, and nervous tissues.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Properties of bioactive glasses BGs as scaffolds employing in regenerative medicine. The principal proprieties of BGs are an optimal drug delivery, antibacterial and biocompatible proprieties, and versatile use.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Successful applications of Hydrogel materials will benefit from their attractive properties. Hydrogel materials own good biocompatible and delivery proprieties. Hydrogels show a long body circulation, with a versatile use including excellent injection capabilities. Hydrogels are biodegradable materials, too.

References

    1. Ahmed L. A. (2013). Stem cells and cardiac repair: alternative and multifactorial approaches. J. Regen. Med. Tissue Eng. 2:8. 10.7243/2050-1218-2-8 - DOI
    1. Akkineni A. R., Luo Y., Schumacher M., Nies B., Lode A., Gelinsky M. (2015). 3D plotting of growth factor loaded calcium phosphate cement scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 27, 264–274. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Annabi N., Tamayol A., Uquillas J. A., Akbari M., Bertassoni L. E., Cha C., et al. . (2014). 25th Anniversary article: rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 26, 85–124. 10.1002/adma.201303233 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antonino A., Francesco A. (2021). Prospective and randomized comparative study of calcium hydroxylapatite vs calcium hydroxylapatite plus HIFU in treatment of moderate-to-severe acne scars. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 20, 53–61. 10.1111/jocd.13472 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antonio C. R., Arroyo Trídico L. (2019). Calcium hydroxyapatite to treat the hands, in Botulinum Toxins, Fillers and Related Substances Clinical Approaches and Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology, eds M. C. A. Issa and B. Tamura (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 349–355.

LinkOut - more resources