Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 19:8:563484.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.563484. eCollection 2021.

The "TIDE"-Algorithm for the Weaning of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Temporarily Mechanical Left Ventricular Support With Impella Devices. A Cardiovascular Physiology-Based Approach

Affiliations

The "TIDE"-Algorithm for the Weaning of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Temporarily Mechanical Left Ventricular Support With Impella Devices. A Cardiovascular Physiology-Based Approach

Carsten Tschöpe et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often required to stabilize therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock patients. Left ventricular (LV) unloading by mechanical ventricular support (MVS) via percutaneous devices, such as with Impella® axial pumps, alone or in combination with extracorporeal life support (ECLS, ECMELLA approach), has emerged as a potential clinical breakthrough in the field. While the weaning from MCS is essentially based on the evaluation of circulatory stability of patients, weaning from MVS holds a higher complexity, being dependent on bi-ventricular function and its adaption to load. As a result of this, weaning from MVS is mostly performed in the absence of established algorithms. MVS via Impella is applied in several cardiogenic shock etiologies, such as acute myocardial infarction (support over days) or acute fulminant myocarditis (prolonged support over weeks, PROPELLA). The time point of weaning from Impella in these cohorts of patients remains unclear. We here propose a novel cardiovascular physiology-based weaning algorithm for MVS. Methods: The proposed algorithm is based on the experience gathered at our center undergoing an Impella weaning between 2017 and 2020. Before undertaking a weaning process, patients must had been ECMO-free, afebrile, and euvolemic, with hemodynamic stability guaranteed in the absence of any inotropic support. The algorithm consists of 4 steps according to the acronym TIDE: (i) Transthoracic echocardiography under full Impella-unloading; (ii) Impella rate reduction in single 8-24 h-steps according to patients hemodynamics (blood pressure, heart rate, and ScVO2), including a daily echocardiographic assessment at minimal flow (P2); (iii) Dobutamine stress-echocardiography; (iv) Right heart catheterization at rest and during Exercise-testing via handgrip. We here present clinical and hemodynamic data (including LV conductance data) from paradigmatic weaning protocols of awake patients admitted to our intensive care unit with cardiogenic shock. We discuss the clinical consequences of the TIDE algorithm, leading to either a bridge-to-recovery, or to a bridge-to-permanent LV assist device (LVAD) and/or transplantation. With this protocol we were able to wean 74.2% of the investigated patients successfully. 25.8% showed a permanent weaning failure and became LVAD candidates. Conclusions: The proposed novel cardiovascular physiology-based weaning algorithm is based on the characterization of the extent and sustainment of LV unloading reached during hospitalization in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing MVS with Impella in our center. Prospective studies are needed to validate the algorithm.

Keywords: Impella; cardiogenic shock; conductance catheter; mechanical circulatory support; pressure-volume; weaning algorithm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CT, FS, and GS received honoraria for talks from Abiomed. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) LV pressure-volume loops (original tracings) from patients during Impella-rate reduction (P2, marked in yellow, on the left) as well as back to maximal unloading (P8, on the right). The typical shift on the xy plan is observed. (B) LV pressure-volume loops (original tracings) from patients during handgrip. On the right a patient who profited from unloading, showing no or minimal increase of LV end-diastolic pressure (EDP, red arrow) during handgrip; on the left a patient who had an abnormal pronounced increase of LV EDP during handgrip, as a sign of blunted contractile reserve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The novel Impella smart assist, displaying real-time LV end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure on the Impella console.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The “TIDE” algorithm for weaning from mechanical circulatory support.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impella's artifacts interfere in 2-dimensional echo and Doppler images of the heart.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The increase in LVOT VTI with a lower level of Impella support is the Doppler echocardiographic demonstration of bi-ventricular recovery.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Summary of a dobutamine stress-echocardiographic examination of a patients after 4 weeks of LV unloading as a treatment for a fulminant non-viral myocarditis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Workflow for clinical decision-making after dobutamine-stress echocardiography.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, et al. . Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2017) 136:e232–68. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Sule S, et al. . Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e000590. 10.1161/JAHA.113.000590 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldberg RJ, Makam RC, Yarzebski J, McManus DD, Lessard D, Gore JM. Decade-Long trends (2001–2011) in the incidence and hospital death rates associated with the in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2016) 9:117–25. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002359 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunziker PR, Pfisterer ME, Stauffer JC, Erne P, et al. . Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. (2008) 149:618–26. 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefevre T, et al. . Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J. (2012) 33:2535–43. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs264 - DOI - PubMed