Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1:17:25-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.02.006. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Dosimetric analysis of Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold technique (DIBH) in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy and evaluation of pre-treatment predictors of cardiac doses for guiding patient selection for DIBH

Affiliations

Dosimetric analysis of Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold technique (DIBH) in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy and evaluation of pre-treatment predictors of cardiac doses for guiding patient selection for DIBH

Soujanya Ferdinand et al. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The risk of radiotherapy-associated cardiovascular disease has been a concern for decades in breast cancer survivors. The objective of our study is to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold technique (DIBH) on organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy and to find out pre-treatment predictors of cardiac doses for guiding patient selection for DIBH.

Material and methods: Pre-radiotherapy planning CT scans were done in Free Breathing (FB) and in DIBH [using Active Breathing Coordinator system (ABC™)] in 31 left sided breast cancer patients. 3DCRT plans were generated for both scans. Comparison of anatomical and dosimetric variables were done using paired t test and correlation was evaluated using Pearson correlation. Linear regression was used to get independent predictors of cardiac sparing and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to find out the specific threshold of the predictors.

Results: There was a 39.15% reduction in mean heart dose in DIBH compared to FB (2.4 Gy vs 4.01 Gy) (p < 0.001), 19% reduction in maximum Left Anterior Descending (LAD) dose and a 9.9% reduction in ipsilateral lung mean dose (p = 0.036) with DIBH. A significant correlation was observed between reduction in Heart Volume in Field (HVIF) and Maximum Heart Depth (MHD) with reduction in mean heart dose. Reduction in HVIF (ΔHVIF) independently predicted cardiac sparing.

Conclusion: DIBH leads to significant reduction in OAR doses and is suggested for all patients of left-sided breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. However, HVIF and MHD predicted for cardiac sparing and threshold criteria of ΔHVIF and ΔMHD may be used by centres with high workload to select patients for DIBH.

Keywords: 3DCRT, Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy; ABC™, Active Breathing Coordinator™; AUC, Area under the curve; BCS, Breast Conservation Surgery; BMI, Body Mass Index; Breast cancer; CCD, Cardiac Contact Distance; CD, Chest Depth; CLD, Central Lung Distance; CS, Chest Separation; CT, Computer Tomography; DIBH, Deep Inspiratory Breath-hold; DVH, Dose Volume Histograms; Deep inspiratory breath-hold; Dosimetric predictors; EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; FB, Free Breathing; HCWD, Heart Chest Wall Distance; HCWL, Heart Chest Wall Length; HH, Heart Height; HV, Heart Volume; HVIF, Heart Volume in Field; IMC, Internal Mammary Chain; LAD, Left Anterior Descending; LOD, Lung Orthogonal Distance; LV, Lung Volume; MHD, Maximum Heart Depth; MRM, Modified Radical Mastectomy; NTCP, Normal Tissue Complications Probability; OAR, Organs-at-risk; PTV, Planning target volume; RNI, Regional Nodal Irradiation; ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; RPM, Real-time Position Management; RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Radiotherapy; SCF, Supraclavicular Fossa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curve for ΔHVIF predicting for >20% reduction in mean heart dose: AUC was 0.91 (p = 0.001; 95% CI-0.81–0.98) with a cut-off value of 6 cc.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve for ΔMHD predicting for >20% reduction in mean heart dose: AUC was 0.768 (p = 0.15; 95%CI 0.58–0.95) with cut-off value of 7 mm.

References

    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane F, Ewertz M et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet (London, England). 2014 Jun 5;383(9935) http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Darby S.C., Ewertz M., McGale P., Bennet A.M., Blom-Goldman U., Brønnum D. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):987–998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209825. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. The Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen H.M., Overgaard M., Grau C., Jensen A.R., Overgaard J. Study of failure pattern among high-risk breast cancer patients with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy in addition to adjuvant systemic therapy: long-term results from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82 b and c randomized studies. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(15):2268–2275. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8738. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources