Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 22;6(8):5276-5286.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05405. eCollection 2021 Mar 2.

Hydrophilic Antireflection and Antidust Silica Coatings

Affiliations

Hydrophilic Antireflection and Antidust Silica Coatings

Mohammad Istiaque Hossain et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

We report on the optical and morphological properties of silica thin layers deposited by reactive RF magnetron sputtering of a SiO2 target under different oxygen to total flow ratios [r(O2) = O2/Ar, ranging from 0 to 25%]. The refractive index (n), extinction coefficient, total transmission, and total reflectance were systematically investigated, while field-emission scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and three-dimensional (3D) average roughness data construction measurements were carried out to probe the surface morphology. Contact angle measurements were performed to assess the hydrophilicity of our coatings as a function of the oxygen content. We performed a thorough numerical analysis using 1D-solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS-1D) based on the measured experimental optical properties to simulate the photovoltaic (PV) device performance, where a clear improvement in the photoconversion efficiency from 25 to 26.5% was clearly observed with respect to r(O2). Finally, a computational analysis using OptiLayer confirmed a minimum total reflectance of less than 0.4% by coupling a silica layer with n = 1.415 with another high-refractive-index (i.e., >2) oxide layer. These promising results pave the way for optimization of silica thin films as efficient antireflection and self-cleaning coatings to display better PV performance in a variety of locations including a desert environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) GIXRD patterns of the thin films grown at [r(O2) = 25%] and 200 °C process temperature. (b) XPS survey, along with Si 2p and O 1s spectra of films grown at r(O2) = 25% shown in the insets. The inset on the left shows oxygen profiling from the XPS study of silica thin films grown at oxygen concentration r(O2) = 0–25%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UV–vis–NIR measurement of the (a) transmittance and absorptance spectra and (b) reflectance spectra of the sputtered silica deposited on glass for various r(O2) oxygen contents.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ellipsometry measurement of (a) refractive index (RI) and (b) extinction coefficient spectra of the sputtered silica on glass for various r(O2) oxygen contents.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histogram representation of (a) refractive index measured at 633 nm of the sputtered silica on glass for r(O2) in the 0–25% range and (b) calculated silica band gaps for different oxygen partial pressures.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Contact angle measurements to assess the hydrophilicity of sputtered silica on glass substrates for various r(O2) values: (a) uncoated glass substrate and hydrophilic (CA ∼ 50°), (b) 0% and hydrophilic (CA ∼ 17.5°), (c) 5% and hydrophilic (CA∼ 6.4°), (d) 10% and hydrophilic (CA ∼5.8°), (e) 15% and superhydrophobic (CA ∼ 4.2°), (f) 20% and superhydrophilic (CA ∼ 3.8°), and (g) 25% and superhydrophilic (CA ∼ 1.5°).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Summary of the measured contact angle measurements of sputtered silica for various r(O2) values along with the reference sample, and its relationship to the refractive index. The dashed lines are a guide for the eye.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Typical SEM micrographs showing the surface morphology of the extreme oxygen content values: (a) r(O2) = 0% and (b) r(O2) = 25%.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Oxygen plasma treatment of the reference glass substrate. Contact angle measurement of the substrate: (a) preplasma treatment and (b) postplasma treatment.
Figure 9
Figure 9
AFM analysis of the (a) untreated glass substrate and (b) 5 min plasma-treated glass substrate.
Figure 10
Figure 10
SEM analysis of the (a) untreated glass substrate and (b) 5 min plasma-treated glass substrate.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Three-dimensional (3D) mode roughness measurement of the sputtered silica on glass for various r(O2) values: (a) reference glass substrate (Ra ∼ 6.35 nm), (b) 0% (Ra ∼ 14 nm), (c) 5% (Ra ∼ 17 nm), (d) 10% (Ra ∼ 22 nm), (e) 15% (Ra ∼ 26 nm), (f) 20% (Ra ∼ 27 nm), and (g) 25% (Ra ∼ 43 nm).
Figure 12
Figure 12
Device performance simulation using the optical properties of SiO2 layers. (a) Open-circuit voltage (Voc), (b) short-circuit current Jsc (mA/cm2), (c) fill factor (FF, %), and (d) power conversion efficiency (PCE, %). The silica thickness was varied from 0 nm (i.e., uncoated glass substrate) to 200 nm. The schematic of the simulated solar cell structure is shown at the top of the figure.

References

    1. Jangjoy A.; Bahador H.; Heidarzadeh H. A Comparative Study of a Novel Anti-reflective Layer to Improve the Performance of a Thin-Film GaAs Solar Cell by Embedding Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Plasmonics 2020, 1–7. 10.1007/s11468-020-01297-2. - DOI
    1. Tabrizi A. A.; Pahlavan A. Efficiency improvement of a silicon-based thin-film solar cell using plasmonic silver nanoparticles and an antireflective layer. Opt. Commun. 2020, 454, 12443710.1016/j.optcom.2019.124437. - DOI
    1. Zahid M. A.; Khokhar M. Q.; Cho E.-C.; Cho Y. H.; Yi J. Impact of Anti-Reflective Coating on Silicon Solar Cell and Glass Substrate: A Brief Review. Curr. Photovoltaic Res. 2020, 8, 1–5.
    1. Ho W.-J.; Yang H.-Y.; Liu J.-J.; Lin P.-J.; Ho C.-H. Plasmonic effects of two-dimensional indium-nanoparticles embedded within SiO2 anti-reflective coating on the performance of silicon solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 14527510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145275. - DOI
    1. Sarkın A. S.; Ekren N.; Sağlam Ş. A review of anti-reflection and self-cleaning coatings on photovoltaic panels. Sol. Energy 2020, 199, 63–73. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.084. - DOI