Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 13;6(1):171-180.
doi: 10.1002/epi4.12460. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Newly diagnosed seizures assessed at two established first seizure clinics: Clinic characteristics, investigations, and findings over 11 years

Anne M McIntosh  1   2   3   4 , K Meng Tan  1   2   5 , Tahir M Hakami  1   6 , Mark R Newton  3   7 , Patrick W Carney  7   8   9   10 , Mengjiazhi Yang  1   2 , Sibel Saya  3   11   12 , David J T Marco  3   13 , Piero Perucca  1   2   4   14 , Patrick Kwan  1   2   4   9   14 , Terence J O'Brien  1   2   4   14 , Samuel F Berkovic  3   7
Affiliations

Newly diagnosed seizures assessed at two established first seizure clinics: Clinic characteristics, investigations, and findings over 11 years

Anne M McIntosh et al. Epilepsia Open. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Epilepsia Open. 2022 Sep;7(3):546. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12586. Epilepsia Open. 2022. PMID: 36049054 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Objective: 'First seizure' clinics (FSCs) aim to achieve early expert assessment for individuals with possible new-onset epilepsy. These clinics also have substantial potential for research into epilepsy evolution, outcomes, and costs. However, a paucity of FSCs details has implications for interpretation and utilization of this research.

Methods: We reviewed investigation findings over 11 years (2000-2010) from two established independent FSCs at Austin Health (AH) and Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Australia. These adult clinics are in major public hospitals and operate with similar levels of expertise. Organizational differences include screening and dedicated administration at AH. Included were N = 1555 patients diagnosed with new-onset unprovoked seizures/epilepsy (AH n = 901, RMH n = 654). Protocol-driven interviews and investigations had been recorded prospectively and were extracted from medical records for study.

Results: Median patient age was 37 (IQR 26-52, range 18-94) years (AH 34 vs RMH 42 years; P < .001). Eighty-six percent of patients attended FSC within three weeks postindex seizure (median AH 12 vs RMH 25 days; P < .01). By their first appointment, 42% had experienced ≥2 seizures. An EEG was obtained within three weeks postindex seizure in 73% of patients, demonstrating epileptiform discharges in 25% (AH 33% vs RMH 15%). Seventy-six percent of patients had an MRI within 6 weeks. Of those with imaging (n = 1500), 19% had potentially epileptogenic abnormalities (RMH 28% vs AH 12%; P < .01). At both sites, changes due to previous stroke/hemorrhage were the commonest lesions, followed by traumatic brain injury. ≥WHO level 1 brain tumors diagnosed at presentation comprised a very small proportion (<1%) at each clinic. At both sites, epilepsy type could be determined in 60% of patients; RMH had more focal and AH more generalized epilepsy diagnoses.

Significance: Differences between the clinics' administrative and screening practices may contribute to differences in investigation findings. Insight into these differences will facilitate interpretation and utilization, and planning of future research.

Keywords: EEG; epilepsy; epileptogenic lesion; imaging; new‐onset.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

References

    1. King MA, Newton MR, Jackson GD, Fitt GJ, Mitchell LA, Silvapulle MJ, et al. Epileptology of the first‐seizure presentation: a clinical, electroencephalographic, and magnetic resonance imaging study of 300 consecutive patients. Lancet. 1998;352:1007–11. - PubMed
    1. Rizvi S, Hernandez‐Ronquillo L, Moien‐Afshari F, Hunter G, Waterhouse K, Dash D, et al. Evaluating the single seizure clinic model: findings from a Canadian Center. J Neurol Sci. 2016;367:203–10. - PubMed
    1. Krumholz A, Wiebe S, Gronseth G, Shinnar S, Levisohn P, Ting T, et al. Practice Parameter: evaluating an apparent unprovoked first seizure in adults (an evidence‐based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2007;69(21):1996–2007. - PubMed
    1. Pohlmann‐Eden B, Burneo JG. Future directions in recognizing and dealing with the first seizure presentation ‐ research and operational issues. Seizure. 2017;49:95–7. - PubMed
    1. Pohlmann‐Eden B, Burneo JG. The broad spectrum of first seizure and newly‐diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure. 2017;49:42–5. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources