Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the Triple M trial): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial
- PMID: 33681738
- PMCID: PMC7910666
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100716
Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the Triple M trial): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial
Abstract
Background: Worldwide, millions of women seek treatment for early pregnancy loss (EPL) annually. Medical management with misoprostol is widely used, but only effective 60% of the time. Pre-treatment with mifepristone prior to misoprostol might improve the success rate of medical management.
Methods: This was a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial in 17 Dutch hospitals. Women with a non-viable pregnancy between 6 and 14 weeks of gestation were eligible for inclusion after at least one week of expectant management. Participants were randomised (1:1) between oral mifepristone 600 mg or an oral placebo tablet. Participants took 400 μg misoprostol orally, repeated after four hours on day two and, if necessary, day three. Primary outcome was expulsion of gestational sac and endometrial thickness <15 mm after 6-8 weeks. Analyses were done according to intention-to-treat principles. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03212352.
Findings: Between June 28th 2018 and January 8th 2020, 175 women were randomised to mifepristone and 176 to placebo, including 344 in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the mifepristone group 136 (79•1%) of 172 participants reached complete evacuation compared to 101 (58•7%) of 172 participants in the placebo group (p<0•0001, RR 1•35, 95% CI 1•16-1•56). Incidence of serious adverse events was significantly lower in the mifepristone group with 24 (14%) patients affected versus 55 (32%) in the placebo group (p = 0•0005) (Table 3).
Interpretation: Pre-treatment with mifepristone prior to misoprostol was more effective than misoprostol alone in managing EPL.
Funding: Healthcare Insurers Innovation Foundation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital.
Keywords: Early pregnancy loss; Mifepristone; Misoprostol.
© 2020 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Hamel reports grants from Healthcare Insurers Innovation Foundation, during the conduct of the study; meant to cover costs of performing the trial, no involvement in any other aspect of the trial such as study design, data gathering/analysis, manuscript preparation. All other authors have nothing to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial comparing mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone in the treatment of early pregnancy loss.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262894. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35139105 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial).BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2497-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31775677 Free PMC article.
-
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):770-778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31788-8. Epub 2020 Aug 24. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 32853559 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice.Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110134. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134. Epub 2023 Jul 29. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 37524147 Review.
-
Medical management of miscarriage: Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Evidence review D.London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023 Aug. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023 Aug. PMID: 37769053 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Retained Products of Conception (RPOC): Diagnosis, Complication & Management.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Oct;73(5):374-380. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01873-6. Epub 2023 Oct 24. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023. PMID: 37916054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial comparing mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone in the treatment of early pregnancy loss.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262894. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35139105 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception-A scoping review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Dec;100(12):2135-2143. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14229. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021. PMID: 34244998 Free PMC article.
-
Haemodynamic stability following adrenaline intracervical block for major haemorrhage during surgical management of late miscarriage: A case report.Case Rep Womens Health. 2022 Dec 17;37:e00476. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00476. eCollection 2023 Mar. Case Rep Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36593895 Free PMC article.
-
Failure Rate of Medical Treatment for Miscarriage Correlated with the Difference between Gestational Age According to Last Menstrual Period and Gestational Size Calculated via Ultrasound.J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6112. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196112. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37834756 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NICE guideline Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. Natl Inst Heal Care Excell. 2019 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126/chapter/Recommendations#symptoms-...
-
- Ammon Avalos L., Galindo C., Li D.K. A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Res Part A - Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94:417–423. - PubMed
-
- https://data.guttmacher.org/. 2020.
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical