Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):1275-1284.
doi: 10.1002/ccd.29581. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

Predicting mortality in cardiogenic shock secondary to ACS requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: The ACS-MCS score

Affiliations

Predicting mortality in cardiogenic shock secondary to ACS requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: The ACS-MCS score

Qussay Marashly et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndrome (ACS-CS) who require short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS).

Background: ACS-CS mortality is high. ST-MCS is an attractive treatment option for hemodynamic support and stabilization of deteriorating patients. Mortality prediction modeling for ACS-CS patients requiring ST-MCS has not been well-defined.

Methods: The Utah Cardiac Recovery (UCAR) Shock database was used to identify patients admitted with ACS-CS requiring ST-MCS devices between May 2008 and August 2018. Pre-ST-MCS clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and angiographic data were collected. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. A weighted score comprising of pre-ST-MCS variables independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality was derived and internally validated.

Results: A total of 159 patients (mean age, 61 years; 78% male) were included. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 49%. Multivariable analysis resulted in four independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality: age, lactate, SCAI CS classification, and acute kidney injury. The model had good calibration and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.80). A predictive score (ranging 0-4) comprised of age ≥ 60 years, pre-ST-MCS lactate ≥2.5 mmol/L, AKI at time of ST-MCS implementation, and SCAI CS stage E effectively risk stratified our patient population.

Conclusion: The ACS-MCS score is a simple and practical predictive score to risk-stratify CS secondary to ACS patients based on their mortality risk. Effective mortality risk assessment for ACS-CS patients could have implications on patient selection for available therapeutic strategy options.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; cardiogenic shock; mechanical circulatory support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Performance of the ACS-MCS risk score on discriminating 30-day all-cause mortality. ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Predicted and observed 30-day all-cause mortality according to the ACS-MCS risk score.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Kaplan-Meier curve for the occurrence of all-cause mortality within the 30-day follow-up period stratified by risk score: low risk (ACS-MCS score 0–1), intermediate risk (ACS-MCS score 2), and high-risk (ACS-MCS score 3–4).
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
The ACS-MCS score as a useful tool in the contemporary management of cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in tertiary care centers. SCAI: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, AKI: Acute kidney injury.

Comment in

  • Risk prediction in cardiogenic shock.
    Tomey MI, Dangas GD. Tomey MI, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):1285-1286. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29996. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. PMID: 34851024 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hollenberg SM, Kavinsky CJ, Parrillo JE. Cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:47–59. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation 2008;117:686–97. - PubMed
    1. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 1999;341:625–34. - PubMed
    1. Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e011991. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;94:29–37. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources