Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Sep;29(9):5383-5390.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06127-7. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

Pegteograstim prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia: a prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance study in Korea

Affiliations
Observational Study

Pegteograstim prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia: a prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance study in Korea

Jaekyung Cheon et al. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: This observational study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegteograstim prophylaxis in patients with lymphoma and solid malignancies.

Methods: This study was conducted at 18 sites in Korea between November 2015 and August 2018.

Results: In total, 611 patients (female, 61.2%) with a median age of 58 (range, 18-88) years were included. Most patients had lymphomas (n = 371, 60.7%) and breast cancer (n = 230, 37.6%) and were administered R-CHOP21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone per 21 days) (n = 284, 46.5%) and AC (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) (n = 177, 29.0%). The total pegteograstim dose in the 611 patients was 14,970 mg (2495 doses), with each patient receiving an average daily dose of 6.0 mg. Neutropenia grade 4 occurred in 97 patients (15.9%), and febrile neutropenia (FN) occurred in 31 patients (5.1%). Among the 611 patients, 267 patients (43.7%) developed 882 adverse events (AEs), and 11 patients (1.8%) experienced 18 adverse drug reactions (ADRs). There were 62 patients (10.2%) who experienced 81 cases of serious adverse events (SAEs), with FN and pneumonia being the most frequent at 14 and 13 episodes, respectively, in 13 patients (2.1%). Meanwhile, 1 patient (0.2%) developed 2 episodes of serious ADRs (grade 1 and grade 2 hypotension). No safety concerns in the elderly and patients with liver and/or renal disease were identified.

Conclusion: The prophylactic use of pegteograstim might have good overall safety and efficacy in patients with lymphomas and solid malignancies in routine clinical practice, even in those who are elderly and have liver and renal diseases.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Lymphoma; Pegteograstim; Prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen AM, Zsebo KM, Inoue H, Hines D, Boone TC, Chazin VR, Tsai L, Ritch T, Souza LM (1987) In vivo stimulation of granulopoiesis by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci 84(8):2484–2488. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.8.2484 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Morstyn G, Campbell L, Souza LM, Alton NK, Keech J, Green M, Sheridan W, Metcalf D, Fox R (1988) Effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor on neutropenia induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Lancet (London, England) 1(8587):667–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91475-4 - DOI
    1. Tanaka H, Satake-Ishikawa R, Ishikawa M, Matsuki S, Asano K (1991) Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor conjugated to polyethylene glycol in rats. Cancer Res 51(14):3710–3714 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Hong J, Lee B, Kang K, Lee SH, Ryu J, Jung G, Oh J, Jo EC, Kim CW (2018) Characterisation of the site-specific monoPEGylated rhG-CSF analogue pegteograstim. Biologicals 51:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.10.002 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Lee KH, Kim JY, Lee MH, Han HS, Lim JH, Park KU, Park IH, Cho EK, Yoon SY, Kim JH, Choi IS, Park JH, Choi YJ, Kim HJ, Jung KH, Kim SY, Oh DY, Im SA (2016) A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09. Support Care Cancer 24(4):1709–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2963-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources