Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May:149:104430.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104430. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review

Safa ElKefi et al. Int J Med Inform. 2021 May.

Abstract

Objective: To ensure the well-being of their patients, health care providers (HCPs) are putting more effort into the quality of the communication they provide in oncology clinics. With the emergence of Health Information Technology (HIT), the dynamics between doctors and patients in oncology settings have changed. The purpose of this literature review is to explore and demonstrate how various health information technologies impact doctor-patient communication in oncology settings.

Method: A systematic literature review was conducted in 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore) to select publications that are in English, published between January 2009 and September 2020. This review reports outcomes related to the impacts of using health information technologies on doctor-patient communication according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA).

Results: We identified 31 studies which satisfied the selection and eligibility criteria. The review revealed a diverse range of HIT used to support communication between cancer patients and their HCPs in oncology settings. Outcomes related to communication were examined to demonstrate how technology can improve access to care in clinical settings and online. When technology is used effectively to support patient knowledge and shared understanding, this increases the patient's satisfaction and ability to manage emotions, make decisions, and progress in their treatment, in addition to increasing social support and building a stronger therapeutic alliance based on shared knowledge and transparency between clinicians and patients.

Conclusion: Technology-based solutions can help strengthen the relationship and communication between patients and their doctors. They can empower the patient's well-being, help doctors make better decisions and enhance the therapeutic alliance between them. Thus, using technology to enhance communication in healthcare settings remains beneficial if its use is structured and target oriented. Future studies should focus on comparing in-depth the difference between outpatient and inpatient settings in terms of the efforts required and the extent of the impacts from both clinicians' and cancer patients' perspectives.

Keywords: Electronic health record; Healthcare quality; Medical informatics; OpenNotes; Patient engagement; Patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement on conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1:
Fig 1:
Conceptual Framework of the search MeSH terms used in the query of the studies for the literature review
Fig 2:
Fig 2:
PRISMA Flow Diagram for Searching and Selection process
Fig 3:
Fig 3:
Conceptual Framework of the 7 pathways functions serving as links between communication and health outcomes guiding the literature review

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Makoul G, & Curry RH (2007). The value of assessing and addressing communication skills. JAMA, 298(9), 1057–1059. 10.1001/jama.298.9.1057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, & Epstein RM (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient education and counseling, 74(3), 295–301. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA, & SCRN Communication Team (2005). The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psycho-oncology, 14(10), 831–847. 10.1002/pon.949 - DOI - PubMed
    1. LeBlanc TW, Back AL, Danis M, & Abernethy AP (2014). Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the oncology clinic: how clinician interaction with EHRs can improve communication with the patient. Journal of oncology practice, 10(5), 317–321. 10.1200/JOP.2014.001385 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eggly S, Penner LA, Hagiwara N, Gonzalez R, Harper FW, Heath EI, & Albrecht TL (2013). Patient, companion, and oncologist agreement regarding information discussed during triadic oncology clinical interactions. Psycho-oncology, 22(3), 637–645. 10.1002/pon.3045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types