Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 9:30:e27.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000160.

Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: rapid review of multi-wave studies

Dirk Richter  1   2   3 , Steffi Riedel-Heller  4 , Simeon Joel Zürcher  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: rapid review of multi-wave studies

Dirk Richter et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. .

Abstract

Aims: The SARS-Cov-2 pandemic and the lockdown response are assumed to have increased mental health problems in general populations compared to pre-pandemic times. The aim of this paper is to review studies on the course of mental health problems during and after the first lockdown phase.

Methods: We conducted a rapid review of multi-wave studies in general populations with time points during and after the first lockdown phase. Repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that utilised validated instruments were included. The main outcome was whether indicators of mental health problems have changed during and after the first lockdown phase. The study was registered with PROSPERO No. CRD42020218640.

Results: Twenty-three studies with 56 indicators were included in the qualitative review. Studies that reported data from pre-pandemic assessments through lockdown indicated an increase in mental health problems. During lockdown, no uniform trend could be identified. After lockdown, mental health problems decreased slightly.

Conclusions: As mental health care utilisation indicators and data on suicides do not suggest an increase in demand during the first lockdown phase, we regard the increase in mental health problems as general distress that is to be expected during a global health crisis. Several methodological, pandemic-related, response-related and health policy-related factors need to be considered when trying to gain a broader perspective on the impact of the first wave of the pandemic and the first phase of lockdown on general populations' mental health.

Keywords: Mental health; Pandemic; Rapid review; SARS-Cov-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow-chart according to PRISMA.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Berkowitz SA and Basu S (2021) Unemployment insurance, health-related social needs, health care access, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Internal Medicine 8, P58–63. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7048. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N and Rubin GJ (2020) The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet 395, 912–920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC (2020) Mental Health – Household Pulse Survey. Atlanta, GA: CDC. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/mental-health.htm..
    1. Chen S, Jones PB, Underwood BR, Moore A, Bullmore ET, Banerjee S, Osimo EF, Deakin JB, Hatfield CF, Thompson FJ, Artingstall JD, Slann MP, Lewis JR and Cardinal RN (2020) The early impact of COVID-19 on mental health and community physical health services and their patients’ mortality in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, UK. Journal of Psychiatric Research 131, 244–254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fernandez-Castilla B, Jamshidi L, Declercq L, Beretvas SN, Onghena P and Van den Noortgate W (2020) The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: a systematic review. Behavioral Research Methods 52, 2031–2052. - PubMed