Targeted rehabilitation may improve patient flow and outcomes: development and implementation of a novel Proactive Rehabilitation Screening (PReS) service
- PMID: 33685858
- PMCID: PMC7942267
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001267
Targeted rehabilitation may improve patient flow and outcomes: development and implementation of a novel Proactive Rehabilitation Screening (PReS) service
Abstract
Rehabilitation programmes can be delivered to patients receiving acute care ('in-reach rehabilitation') and/or those who have completed acute care but experience ongoing functional impairments ('subacute rehabilitation'). Access to these programmes depends on a rehabilitation assessment, but there are concerns that referrals for this assessment are often triggered too late in the acute care journey. We describe a Proactive Rehabilitation Screening (PReS) process designed to systematically screen patients during an acute hospital admission, and identify early those who are likely to require specialist rehabilitation assessment and intervention. The process is based on review of patient medical records on day 5 after acute hospital admission, or day 3 after transfer from intensive care to an acute hospital ward. Screening involves brief review of documented care needs, pre-existing and new functional disabilities, the need for allied health interventions and non-medical factors delaying discharge. From May 2017 to February 2019, the novel screening process was implemented as part of a service redesign of the rehabilitation consultation service. Four thousand consecutive screens were performed at the study site. Of those 'ruled in' by screening as needing a rehabilitation assessment, 86.0% went on to receive inpatient rehabilitation interventions. Of those 'ruled out' by screening, 92.1% did not go on to receive a rehabilitation intervention, while 7.9% did receive some form of rehabilitation intervention. Of all patients accepted into a rehabilitation programme (n=516), PReS was able to identify 53.6% (n=282) of them before the acute care teams made a referral (based on traditional criteria). In conclusion, we have designed and implemented a systematic, PReS service in one metropolitan Australian hospital. The process described was found to be time efficient and feasible to implement in an acute hospital setting. Further, it appeared to identify the majority of patients who went on to receive formal inpatient rehabilitation interventions.
Keywords: process mapping; quality improvement; rehabilitation.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI) . Nsw rehabilitation model of care version 1.5 issued 06/01/2015, 2015. Available: https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/rehabilitation/rehabilitatio...
-
- Australasian Rehabilitation Outcome Centre (AROC) . The aroC annual report: the state of rehabilitation in Australia in 2019, 2019updated 2 November 2020. Available from. Available: https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@chsd/@aroc/docu...
-
- The National Institute for health and care excellence (NICE). rehabilitation after critical illness. NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG83 (accessed 10 September 2019).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources