Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):126-134.
doi: 10.1370/afm.2650.

Scaling Up Patient-Centered Interdisciplinary Care for Multimorbidity: A Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial

Scaling Up Patient-Centered Interdisciplinary Care for Multimorbidity: A Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

Martin Fortin et al. Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the effectiveness of a 4-month interdisciplinary multifaceted intervention based on a change in care delivery for patients with multimorbidity in primary care practices.

Methods: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a mixed-methods design in patients aged 18 to 80 years with 3 or more chronic conditions from 7 family medicine groups (FMGs) in Quebec, Canada. Health care professionals (nurses, nutritionists, kinesiologists) from the FMGs were trained to deliver the patient-centered intervention based on a motivational approach and self-management support. Primary outcomes: self-management (Health Education Impact Questionnaire); and self-efficacy.

Secondary outcomes: health status, quality of life, and health behaviors. Quantitative analyses used multi-level mixed effects and generalized linear mixed models controlling for clustering within FMGs. We also conducted in-depth interviews with patients, family members, and health care professionals.

Results: The trial randomized 284 patients (144 in intervention group, 140 in control group). The groups were comparable. After 4 months, the intervention showed a neutral effect for the primary outcomes. There was significant improvement in 2 health behaviors (healthy eating with odds ratios [OR] 4.36; P = .006, and physical activity with OR 3.43; P = .023). The descriptive qualitative evaluation revealed that the patients reinforced their self-efficacy and improved their self-management which was divergent from the quantitative results.

Conclusions: Quantitatively, this intervention showed a neutral effect on the primary outcomes and substantial improvement in 2 health behaviors as secondary outcomes. Qualitatively, the intervention was evaluated as positive. The combination of qualitative and quantitative designs proved to be a good design for evaluating this complex intervention.

Keywords: interdisciplinary research; multimorbidity; patient care team; pragmatic clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stewart M, Fortin M; Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity Team . Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity: funded evaluation protocol. CMAJ Open. 2017; 5(2): E365-E372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health . Identifying innovative mechanisms or interventions that target multimorbidity and its consequences (R01 Clinical Trial Optional). Published 2020. Accessed Jun 30, 2020. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-20-180.html
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research . CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research Strategic Plan 2015-19. Published 2016. Accessed Jun 30, 2020. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49711.html
    1. Clair M. Les Solutions émergentes: rapport et recommandations. Commission d’enquête sur les services de santé et de bien-être. Ottawa: Gouvernement du Canada; 2000.
    1. Breton M, Lévesque JF, Pineault R, Hogg W. Primary care reform: can quebec’s family medicine group model benefit from the experience of ontario’s family health teams? Healthc Policy. 2011; 7(2): e122-e135. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources