Diagnostic accuracy of chest computed tomography in improving the false negative rate as compared to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: A cross sectional analysis of 348 cases from India
- PMID: 33686974
- PMCID: PMC8104344
- DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_410_20
Diagnostic accuracy of chest computed tomography in improving the false negative rate as compared to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: A cross sectional analysis of 348 cases from India
Abstract
Background: Early differentiation between emergency department (ED) patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is very important. The diagnosis of COVID-19 depends on real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). On imaging, computed tomography (CT) manifestations resemble those seen in viral pneumonias, with multifocal ground-glass opacities and consolidation in a peripheral distribution being the most common findings. Although these findings lack specificity for COVID-19 diagnosis on imaging grounds, CT could be used to provide objective assessment about the extension of the lung opacities, which could be used as an imaging surrogate for disease burden. We set out to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT scanning in detecting COVID-19 in a population with suspected COVID-19 patients.
Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional single-center study performed on 348 cases with clinical suspicion of COVID-19, all adult symptomatic ED patients had both a CT scan and a PCR upon arrival at. CT results were compared with PCR test (s) and diagnostic accuracy was calculated.
Results: Between February 15, 2020, and June 30, 2020, 348 symptomatic patients were included. In total, 62.3% of patients had a positive PCR and 69.8% had a positive CT, resulting in a sensitivity of 94.2%, specificity of 76.7%, likelihood ratio (LR) of +2.94 and (LR) -0.18. The sensitivity of the CT tended to be higher in those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (100.0%, P = 0.017) and severe COVID-19 (98.5%, P = 0.027) than in patients with mild (82.5%, P = 0.047) and moderate COVID-19 (89.3%, P = 0.039). The diagnostic ability of chest CT was found to be high with 86.3% concordance between findings of CT and PCR. In 48 (13.7%) patients, discordant findings between CT and PCR were observed. In most cases, the CT scan was considered suspicious for COVID-19, while the PCR was negative (37/48, 77.0%). In the majority of these, the diagnosis at discharge was pulmonary infection (n = 26; 54.1%).
Conclusion: The accuracy of chest CT in symptomatic COVID suspect patients is high, but when used as a single diagnostic test, CT cannot accurately diagnose or exclude COVID-19. Therefore, we recommend a combination of both CT and RT-PCR for future follow-up, management, and medical surveillance.
Keywords: CT; Coronavirus disease 2019; RT PCR; sensitivity; specificity.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures














Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy and false-positive rate of chest CT as compared to RT-PCR in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: A prospective cohort of 612 cases from India and review of literature.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021 Jan;31(Suppl 1):S161-S169. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_377_20. Epub 2021 Jan 23. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33814777 Free PMC article.
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. PMID: 32997361 Updated.
-
CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in The Netherlands: A prospective study.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235844. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32645053 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Chest CT with RT-PCR in Suspected Coronavirus Patients in Bangladesh.Mymensingh Med J. 2020 Oct;29(4):964-968. Mymensingh Med J. 2020. PMID: 33116103
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 16;3:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub4. PMID: 33242342 Updated.
Cited by
-
Estimate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibodies prevalence among Iranian population based on blood donations: A serial cross-sectional study during the third wave of the pandemic.Transfus Clin Biol. 2023 Feb;30(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Transfus Clin Biol. 2023. PMID: 36084918 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive analysis of prognosis and tumor immune microenvironment of cuproptosis-related gene CDKN2A in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03631-y. BMC Pulm Med. 2025. PMID: 40229853 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of chest computed tomography imaging for COVID-19 based on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction: a meta-analysis.Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Oct 21;10(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00910-8. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021. PMID: 34674774 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–42. - PubMed
-
- WHO 2020, We now have a name for the #2019nCoV disease: COVID-19. I’ll spell it: C-O-V-I-D hyphen one nine – COVID-19”, Tweet; 11 February. 2020. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1227248333871173632 .
-
- [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 29];Wuhan Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Global Cases (by Johns Hopkins CSSE). Case Dashboard.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources