Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;7(5):868-876.
doi: 10.1002/cre2.413. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Coordinated features in jaw and neck muscle activities induced by chewing of soft and hard gum in healthy subjects

Affiliations

Coordinated features in jaw and neck muscle activities induced by chewing of soft and hard gum in healthy subjects

Tomohiro Ishii et al. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Backgrounds: Jaw and neck muscles may be activated by chewing load using a hard food. However, it remains unclear how effects the gum hardness to the coordinated features in jaw and neck muscle activities during chewing performance.

Objectives: This study was conducted to quantitatively elucidate the effects of the hardness of the gum on coordinated features in jaw and neck muscle activities using intermuscular EMG-EMG transfer function and EMG-EMG coherence function analyses in 18 healthy subjects.

Methods: Jaw and neck muscle activities were aggregated into the first peak frequency of the power spectrum, and power, gain, phase, and coherence parameters between jaw and neck muscle activities were examined in the first peak frequencies during soft and hard gum chewing.

Results: The first peak frequency was not significantly different between soft and hard gum chewing. In contrast, power values of the jaw and neck muscles were significantly increased by chewing of hard gum as compared with soft gum, whereas gain, phase, and coherence were not significantly changed by gum hardness.

Conclusions: The chewing rhythm, the quantitative and temporal coordination, and the functional coordination in jaw and neck muscle activities were not changed during soft and hard gum chewing, as well as increased jaw and neck muscles activities. It is therefore concluded that the chewing rhythmicity and jaw and neck muscles coordination accompanied with the increased jaw and neck muscle activities are maintained under the condition of the chewing load using gum hardness in the healthy individuals.

Keywords: chewing gum; masticatory muscles; masticatory systems; neck muscles; surface electromyography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Takeshi Uchida and Ikuo Kantake are employed by Dental Support Co. Ltd. Neither has any potential conflicts of interest to declare with respect to research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Raw and rectified EMG activities and power spectrum, as well as representative power phase and coherence in jaw and neck muscle activities with soft and hard gum chewing. Raw EMG activities (a, b) and full wave rectification of muscle activity (c, d) in jaw and neck muscles during chewing of soft (a, c) and hard (b, d) gum for 80s in a representative subject. Area between vertical lines indicates analyzing phase (61.5 s). The power spectrum for jaw and neck muscle activities by FFT from 0 to 20 Hz (e, f), and arrows indicate the first peak frequency in the power spectrum. Gain (g, h) and phase (i, j) were analyzed using transfer function analysis, while coherence (k, l) was analyzed using coherence function analysis. The 95% confidence level (0.19) for the coherence spectrum shown in (k) and (l) is presented as a horizontal line. C and NC represent chewing side and non‐chewing side, respectively. Mm, ta, AD, and SCM represent masseter muscle, anterior temporal muscle, anterior digastric muscle, and sternocleidomastoid muscle, respectively
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Gain for jaw and neck muscle activities. Mean and standard deviation of gain values for the first peak frequency of jaw closing (NC‐mm, C‐/NC‐ta), jaw opening (C‐/NC‐AD), and neck (C‐/NC‐SCM) muscle activities are shown. No significant differences were seen for gain between soft and hard gum chewing (Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, paired t‐test). The prefixes of ‘C’ (open circle) and ‘NC’ (black circle) denote the chewing side and non‐chewing side muscles, respectively. Mm, ta, AD, and SCM represent masseter muscle, anterior temporal muscle, anterior digastric muscle, and sternocleidomastoid muscle, respectively
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Phase for jaw and neck muscle activities. Mean and standard deviation of phase values for first peak frequency of jaw closing (NC‐mm, C‐/NC‐ta), jaw opening (C‐/NC‐AD), and neck (C‐/NC‐SCM) muscle activities are shown. No significant differences were seen for phase between soft and hard gum (Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, paired t‐test). The prefixes of ‘C’ (open circle) and ‘NC’ (black circle) denote the chewing side and non‐chewing side muscles, respectively. Mm, ta, AD, and SCM represent masseter muscle, anterior temporal muscle, anterior digastric muscle, and sternocleidomastoid muscle, respectively
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Coherence for jaw and neck muscle activities. Mean and standard deviation of coherence values for the first peak frequency of jaw closing (NC‐mm, C‐/NC‐ta), jaw opening (C‐/NC‐AD), and neck (C‐/NC‐SCM) muscle activities are shown. No significant differences were seen for coherence between soft and hard gum (Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, paired t test). The 95% confidence level (0.19) for the coherence spectrum is shown by a horizontal line. The prefixes of ‘C’ (open circle) and ‘NC’ (black circle) denote the chewing side and non‐chewing side muscles, respectively. Mm, ta, AD, and SCM represent masseter muscle, anterior temporal muscle, anterior digastric muscle, and sternocleidomastoid muscle, respectively

Similar articles

References

    1. Carter, G. , Knapp, C. , & Nuttall, A. (1973). Estimation of the magnitude squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 21, 337–344.
    1. Clark, D. J. (2015). Automaticity of walking: Functional significance, mechanisms, measurement and rehabilitation strategies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ehara, T. , Ogawa, Y. , Kato, J. , Aoki, K. , Ogawa, S. , & Iwasaki, K. (2012). The effect of dexmedetomidine on arterial‐cardiac baroreflex function assessed by spectral and transfer function analysis. Journal of Anesthesia, 26, 483–489. - PubMed
    1. Eriksson, P. O. , Häggman‐Henrikson, B. , Nordh, E. , & Zafar, H. (2000). Co‐ordinated mandibular and head‐neck movements during rhythmic jaw activities in man. Journal of Dental Research, 79, 1378–1384. - PubMed
    1. Eriksson, P. O. , Zafar, H. , & Nordh, E. (1998). Concomitant mandibular and head‐neck movements during jaw opening‐closing in man. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 25, 859–870. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources