Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;279(2):695-702.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06700-0. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct

Affiliations

Auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct

Linsheng Wang et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA).

Methods: 15 EVA cases (26 ears) confirmed via high-resolution MRI (HRMRI) that did not meet the Valvassori criterion on high-resolution CT (HRCT) were classified as atypical EVA. Another 21 EVA cases (40 ears) meeting the Valvassori criterion were randomly chosen as typical EVA. The hearing loss (HL), HRCT, and HRMRI findings were compared between the two groups.

Results: The difference of HL severity between atypical and typical EVA was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.12, P > 0.05. The vestibular aqueducts (VA) of atypical EVA cases manifested as borderline dilation (n = 17), focal dilation (n = 3), and normal appearance (n = 6) on the HRCT. The midpoint width of atypical and typical EVA cases was 1.06 ± 0.18 mm and 2.10 ± 0.55 mm, respectively, exhibiting a significant difference (t = - 9.20, P < 0.05). In the HRMRI, the degree of dilation and shape of the intraosseous partition of endolymphatic duct and sac (ES) was similar to that of VA on HRCT, while their extraosseous ES was depicted variable slighter dilation compared to that of typical one, the difference between them was statistically significant (t = - 4.10, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The HL severity of atypical EVA ears was similar to that of typical ones. Nevertheless, borderline, focal dilation and normal-like appearance of VAs on HRCT and variablely slighter dilation of the extraosseous ES on HRMRI are its characteristic imaging findings.

Keywords: Atypical; Enlarged vestibular aqueduct; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography; X-ray computed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Noguchi Y, Fukuda S, Fukushima K, Gyo K, Hara A, Nakashima T et al (2017) A nationwide study on enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx 44:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2016.04.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu SH, Ma XL (2019) Analysis of the correlation between radiological and audiological features of patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 54:734–740. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.10.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bu H, Chen P (2018) Research progress in imaging of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 32: 639-642 https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.08.021
    1. Connor SEJ, Dudau C, Pai I, Gaganasiou M (2019) Is CT or MRI the optimal imaging investigation for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and large endolymphatic sac anomaly? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05279-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Deep NL, Carlson ML, Weindling SM, Barrs DM, Driscoll CLW, Lohse CM et al (2019) Diagnosing large vestibular aqueduct: radiological review of high-resolution CT versus high-resolution volumetric MRI. Otol Neurotol 38:948–955. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001482 - DOI

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources