Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 19:2021:8880893.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8880893. eCollection 2021.

Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Tools in Predicting Pulmonary Embolism

Michael A Simon  1 , Christopher Tan  1 , Patrick Hilden  2 , Lyle Gesner  1 , Barry Julius  1
Affiliations

Effectiveness of Clinical Decision Tools in Predicting Pulmonary Embolism

Michael A Simon et al. Pulm Med. .

Abstract

Objective: The Wells criteria and revised Geneva score are two commonly used clinical decision tools (CDTs) developed to assist physicians in determining when computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) should be performed to evaluate the high index of suspicion for pulmonary embolism (PE). Studies have shown varied accuracy in these CDTs in identifying PE, and we sought to determine their accuracy within our patient population.

Methods: Patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) who received a CTA for suspected PE from 2019 Jun 1 to 2019 Aug 31 were identified. Two CDTSs, the Wells criteria and revised Geneva score, were calculated based on data available prior to CTA and using the common D-Dimer cutoff of >500 μg/L. We determined the association between confirmed PE and CDT values and determined the association between the D-Dimer result and PE.

Results: 392 CTAs were identified with 48 (12.1%) positive PE cases. The Wells criteria and revised Geneva score were significantly associated with PE but failed to identify 12.5% and 70.4% of positive PE cases, respectively. Within our cohort, a D-Dimer cutoff of >300 μg/L was significantly associated with PE and captured 95.2% of PE cases.

Conclusions: Both CDTs were significantly associated with PE but failed to identify PE in a significant number of cases, particularly the revised Geneva score. Alternative D-Dimer cutoffs may provide better accuracy in identifying PE cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hsu N., Soo Hoo G. W. Underuse of clinical decision rules and d-dimer in suspected pulmonary embolism: a nationwide survey of the Veterans Administration Healthcare System. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.10.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wells P. S., Anderson D. R., Rodger M., et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001;135(2):98–107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. le Gal G., Righini M., Roy P. M., et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144(3):165–171. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolf S. J., McCubbin T. R., Feldhaus K. M., Faragher J. P., Adcock D. M. Prospective validation of Wells criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2004;44(5):503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simon E., Miake-Lye I. M., Smith S. W., et al. An evaluation of guideline-discordant ordering behavior for CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019;16(8):1064–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources