Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 28:10:5.
doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_289_20. eCollection 2021.

Overcrowding an encumbrance for an emergency health-care system: A perspective of Health-care providers from tertiary care center in Northern India

Raman Sharma  1 , Ajay Prakash  2 , Rajeev Chauhan  3 , Deba Prasad Dhibar  4
Affiliations

Overcrowding an encumbrance for an emergency health-care system: A perspective of Health-care providers from tertiary care center in Northern India

Raman Sharma et al. J Educ Health Promot. .

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is one of the leading problems of health-care organizations, discerned by ED medical staff, but it has never been measured objectively.

Objective: A 2 months prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to compare ED overcrowding measurement tools with the perceptions of ED emergency physician and ED assistant nursing superintendent (EDEP/EDANS).

Results: The results have shown that perceptions of ED overcrowding as noted by EDEP and EDANS, taken on a Likert scale, were 83.34% and 86.67%, respectively. Kappa values show a significant agreement between EDEP and EDANS subjective perceptions with objective values of the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS), Real-time Emergency Analysis of Demand Indicators (READI), and Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN) scales. Furthermore, all three scales have statistically significant correlation; NEDOCS and READI had highest level of correlation coefficient (r = 0.662, P < 0.01) whereas READI and EDWIN shows least correlation coefficient value (r = 0.155, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Therefore, these scales may serve to quantify the subjective impressions of ED overcrowding. Evidence is clear of overcrowding harms, measures are needed to provide urgent medical care and future work up is need of the hour to systematically evaluate interventions and guide evidence-based policies.

Keywords: Overcrowding; perceptions; quality of care; quantitative scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EDEP overcrowding scoring (likert scale)
Figure 2
Figure 2
ED ANS overcrowding scoring (likert scale)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statistics for crowding scales
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCain R, Hamilton R, Linnehan F. “Emergency department overcrowding as a Nash equilibrium: Hypothesis and test by survey methodology,” in Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. In: S Osinga, G Hofstede, T Verwaart., editors. Springer, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: 2011. pp. 90–102.
    1. Jayaprakash N, O'Sullivan R, Bey T, Ahmed SS, Lotfipour S. Crowding and delivery of healthcare in emergency departments: The European perspective. West J Emerg Med. 2009;10:233–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris ZS, Boyle A, Beniuk K, Robinson S. Emergency department crowding: Towards an agenda for evidence-based intervention. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:460–6. - PubMed
    1. Salway RJ, Valenzuela R, Shoenberger JM, Mallonw K, Viccellio A. Emergency department (ED) overcrowding: Evidence-based answers to frequently asked questions RevistaMédicaClínica Las Condes. 2017 Mar-Apr;28(2):213–9.
    1. Atzema C, Bandiera G, Schull MJ. Emergency department crowding: The effect on resident education. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:276–81. - PubMed