Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 10:10:e65703.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.65703.

eIF2B conformation and assembly state regulate the integrated stress response

Affiliations

eIF2B conformation and assembly state regulate the integrated stress response

Michael Schoof et al. Elife. .

Erratum in

Abstract

The integrated stress response (ISR) is activated by phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2 in response to various stress conditions. Phosphorylated eIF2 (eIF2-P) inhibits eIF2's nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B, a twofold symmetric heterodecamer assembled from subcomplexes. Here, we monitor and manipulate eIF2B assembly in vitro and in vivo. In the absence of eIF2B's α-subunit, the ISR is induced because unassembled eIF2B tetramer subcomplexes accumulate in cells. Upon addition of the small-molecule ISR inhibitor ISRIB, eIF2B tetramers assemble into active octamers. Surprisingly, ISRIB inhibits the ISR even in the context of fully assembled eIF2B decamers, revealing allosteric communication between the physically distant eIF2, eIF2-P, and ISRIB binding sites. Cryo-electron microscopy structures suggest a rocking motion in eIF2B that couples these binding sites. eIF2-P binding converts eIF2B decamers into 'conjoined tetramers' with diminished substrate binding and enzymatic activity. Canonical eIF2-P-driven ISR activation thus arises due to this change in eIF2B's conformational state.

Keywords: ISR; ISRIB; allostery; biochemistry; cell biology; chemical biology; eIF2; eIF2B; human.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MS, MB, LW, RL No competing interests declared, AF Reviewing editor, eLife, PW PW is an inventor on U.S. Patent 9708247 held by the Regents of the University of California that describes ISRIB and its analogs. Rights to the invention have been licensed by UCSF to Calico.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cellular eIF2B assembly state in cells modulates the integrated stress response (ISR).
(A) Schematic of eIF2B assembly state modulation via the FKBP12F36V/dTag13 system used to induce degradation of eIF2Bα. (B) Western blot of K562 cell extracts after treatment with thapsigargin (tg) or dTag13 for 3 hr as indicated. Thapsigargin induces the ISR by depleting Ca2+ levels in the endoplasmic reticulum. Loading of all lanes was normalized to total protein. (C–E) ATF4 reporter levels as monitored by flow cytometry. Trimethoprim was at 20 μM. (C) Samples after 3 hr of dTag13 treatment (EC50 = 15 nM; s.e.m. = 1 nM). (D) Samples after 3 hr of ISRIB treatment ± 83 nM dTag13 (EC50 = 1.4 nM; s.e.m. = 0.3 nM). (E) Timecourse of tg treatment (dTag13 = 83 nM, tg = 100 nM, ISRIB = 2 μM). For (B), eIF2Bδ, eIF2Bα, and GAPDH blots, and the ATF4 and eIF2α blots are from the same gels, respectively; the eIF2α-P blot is from its own gel. For (C–E), biological replicates: n = 3. All error bars represent s.e.m.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Overview of key eIF2 and eIF2B interaction surfaces.
A surface representation of a model of two eIF2 heterotrimers and ISRIB bound to an eIF2B decamer is shown (PDB ID: 6O85). Individual subunits of eIF2 and eIF2B are indicated. The eIF2 heterotrimers are outlined in white and the locations of interfaces IF1–IF4 are indicated, as are the positions of eIF2α S51, the GTP binding pocket (empty in the structure), and ISRIB (shown in stick representation). The eIF2Bα2 dimer is hidden in this orientation. eIF2Bε contains two domains linked by a flexible tether that was not resolved in the structure.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.. Tagging of eIF2B subunits in K562 cells.
(A) Western blot of eIF2B subunits in parental and edited K562 cells. Integrated stress response (ISR) reporter cells and assembly state reporter cells were edited at the EIF2B1 locus (eIF2Bα-FKBP12F36V N-terminal fusion). No evidence of WT protein is observed in either cell line. Assembly state reporter cells were edited at the EIF2B2 locus (eIF2Bβ-mNeonGreen C-terminal fusion) and the EIF2B4 locus (eIF2Bδ-mScarlet-i C-terminal fusion). No evidence of WT protein is observed in these cells. The asterisk denotes a non-specific band. The double asterisk denotes a minor eIF2Bδ species likely resulting from mScarlet-i/G/S linker proteolysis during sample preparation. eIF2Bδ and eIF2Bα blots and eIF2Bε and GAPDH blots are from the same gel, respectively; eIF2Bβ is from its own blot. (B) One percent agarose gel of PCR amplified eIF2Bα-, eIF2Bβ-, and eIF2Bδ-encoding loci from parental and edited cell line gDNA preps. The lengths of the eIF2Bβ and eIF2Bδ products demonstrate that no unedited alleles are present in the assembly state reporter cells. The length of the eIF2Bα product demonstrates that some tagged as well as some untagged alleles are present in both cell lines. Based on the lack of WT length protein, the remaining untagged alleles likely harbor deletions or frameshift mutations that prevent synthesis or destroy the protein product. The asterisk denotes a non-specific band.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3.. Integrated stress response (ISR) reporter design.
A schematic of the ATF4 translation and general translation reporters used to read out ISR activation.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4.. Decreases in general translation after eIF2Bα depletion.
(A–C) General translation reporter signal from the experiments shown in (A) Figure 1C, (B) Figure 1D, and (C) Figure 1E.
Figure 1—figure supplement 5.
Figure 1—figure supplement 5.. dTag13 treatment alone does not activate the integrated stress response (ISR).
Parental cells containing the ATF4 and general translation reporters as well as the edited cells where eIF2Bα was tagged with an FKBP12F36V degron were treated with 500 nM dTag13 or untreated (0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) for 24 hr and then 20 μM trimethoprim for 3 hr. ATF4 and general translation reporter levels were monitored by flow cytometry, and the change in reporter signal between dTag13 treated and untreated conditions is shown. dTag13 only activates the ISR when eIF2Bα is endogenously tagged with the FKBP12F36V degron.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) system monitors eIF2B assembly state.
(A) Schematic depicting the principle of eIF2B assembly state modulation by ISRIB and eIF2Bα2 and FRET readout. (B, C) FRET signal (E592/E516) measured after 1 hr of incubation with (B) ISRIB (EC50 = 250 nM; s.e.m. = 80 nM) or (C) eIF2Bα2 (EC50 = 20 nM; s.e.m. = 4 nM) at 50 nM eIF2Bβδγε-F. (D–F) Timecourse monitoring of FRET signal (E592/E516) after addition of (D) ISRIB (association t1/2 = 5.1 min, s.e.m. = 0.5 min; dissociation t1/2 = 15 min, s.e.m. = 1 min), (E) eIF2Bα2 (association t1/2 = 7.3 min, s.e.m. = 0.6 min; dissociation t1/2 = 180 min, s.e.m. = 10 min), or (F) ISRIB + eIF2Bα2 (association t1/2 = 7 min, s.e.m. = 1 min; dissociation t1/2 = N/A) at 50 nM eIF2Bβδγε-F. At t = 52 min, unlabeled eIF2Bβδγε was added to a final concentration of 1 μM. For (B, C), representative replicate averaging four technical replicates is shown. For (D–F), representative replicate averaging three technical replicates is shown. For (B–F), biological replicates: n = 3. All error bars represent s.e.m.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. eIF2Bβδγε-F can octamerize and decamerize.
Analytical ultracentrifugation (sedimentation velocity) was used to determine eIF2B complex assembly state. Treatment with ISRIB induces octamerization of eIF2Bβδγε-F. Treatment with eIF2Bα2 induces decamerization. Also, 1 μM ISRIB, 1 μM eIF2Bβδγε-F, and 500 nM eIF2Bα2 were used.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.. Validation of eIF2Bβδγε-F kinetics.
(A–C) Treatment of 50 nM eIF2Bβδγε-F with ISRIB or eIF2Bα2 led to no changes in Förster resonance energy transfer signal when simultaneously treated with excess of untagged eIF2Bβδγε (1 μM). For (A–C), representative replicate averaging three technical replicates is shown. Biological replicates: n = 2. All error bars represent s.e.m.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3.. ISRIB treatment does not impact guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity when eIF2Bα2 is saturating.
GEF activity of eIF2B as assessed by BODIPY-FL-GDP exchange. BODIPY-FL-GDP fluorescence decreases when free in solution. t1/2 = 1.6 min (Control) and 1.9 min (1 μM ISRIB). Biological replicates: n = 3.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. eIF2B is a decamer in both unstressed and stressed cells, and ISRIB blocks integrated stress response (ISR) activation.
(A) Western blot of K562 ISR reporter cell extracts after treatment with thapsigargin (tg) or dTag13 for 3 hr as indicated. (B–D) Förster resonance energy transfer signal as monitored by flow cytometry after 3 hr treatment with (B) dTag13 (EC50 = 5.1 nM; s.e.m. = 0.2 nM), (C) ISRIB ± 83 nM dTag13 (EC50 = 80 nM; s.e.m. = 10 nM), and (D) various stressors (83 nM dTag13, 50 nM tg, ± 1.6 μM ISRIB). The ratio of mScarlet-i/mNeonGreen emission is presented. (E) Western blot of K562 ISR reporter cell extracts treated for 3 hr with ISRIB, tg, and/or dTag13 as indicated. All lanes across gels were loaded with equal total protein. For (A), eIF2Bδ, eIF2Bα, and GAPDH blots, and the ATF4 and eIF2α blots are from the same gels, respectively; the eIF2α-P blot is from its own gel. For (E), eIF2Bδ, eIF2Bβ, and GAPDH blots, ATF4 and eIF2α blots, and eIF2Bα and eIF2α-P blots are from the same gels, respectively. For (B–D), biological replicates: n = 3. All error bars represent s.e.m.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. ISRIB and eIF2-P compete for eIF2B binding.
(A) Western blot of K562 integrated stress response (ISR) reporter cell extracts after treatment with tg ± ISRIB as indicated (left panel) or of eIF2B-bound fraction isolated by anti-FLAG immunoprecipitation of the eIF2B-mNeonGreen-FLAG tagged subunit under native conditions (right panel). (B–D) Plot of fluorescence polarization signal after incubation of FAM-ISRIB (2.5 nM) with 100 nM eIF2B(αβδγε)2 and varying concentrations of (B) ISRIB (IC50 = 37 nM; s.e.m. = 1 nM), (C) eIF2 or eIF2-P (IC50 = 210 nM; s.e.m. = 120 nM), and (D) eIF2α or eIF2α-P (IC50 = 4000 nM; s.e.m. = 200 nM). (E–F) Timecourse of fluorescence polarization signal after addition of (E) eIF2α kinase PKR and ATP or (F) λ phosphatase. FAM-ISRIB was at 2.5 nM. eIF2B(αβδγε)2 was at 100 nM. eIF2α and eIF2α-P were at 5.6 μM. In (A), eIF2Bδ, eIF2Bα, and eIF2α blots, eIF2Bβ and eIF2α-P blots, and ATF4 and GAPDH blots are from the same gels, respectively. All cell lysate or eIF2B-bound lanes across all gels were loaded with equal total protein. Biological replicates: (B) n = 3; (C) n = 5 (n = 4 at 2 μM); and (D–F) n = 3. All error bars represent s.e.m.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. eIFα-P is the minimal unit needed to inhibit nucleotide exchange by eIF2B.
(A–D) Guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity of eIF2B as assessed by BODIPY-FL-GDP exchange. eIF2B(αβδγε)2 was at 10 nM throughout. For (A) t1/2 = 1.6 min (Control), 2.5 min (50 nM eIF2-P), 3.5 min (100 nM eIF2-P), and 7.2 min (250 nM eIF2-P). For (B) t1/2 = 2.4 min (Control), 3.0 min (0.2 μM eIF2α-P), 5.0 min (1 μM eIF2α-P), and 6.7 min (2 μM eIF2α-P). For (C) t1/2 = 1.6 min (Control), 1.9 min (1 μM ISRIB), 3.1 min (250 nM eIF2-P + 1 μM ISRIB), and 7.2 min (250 nM eIF2-P). For (D) t1/2 = 1.6 min (Control), 1.9 min (1 μM ISRIB), 3.1 min (2.5 μM eIF2α-P + 1 μM ISRIB), and 5.3 min (2.5 μM eIF2α-P). All error bars represent s.e.m. Biological replicates: (A–D) n = 3 except for the 100 and 50 nM eIF2-P conditions in (A), where n = 2.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. eIFα-P reduces eIF2B’s catalytic activity and antagonizes eIF2 binding.
(A) Initial velocity of eIF2B-catalyzed nucleotide exchange as a function of eIF2 concentration. eIF2B(αβδγε)2 concentration was 10 nM. (B) Plot of kcat/KM for tetramer and decamer at varying eIF2α-P concentrations, obtained by fitting the linear portion of the Michaelis–Menten saturation curve. Keeping the number of eIF2 binding sites constant, the eIF2B(αβδγε)2 concentration was 10 nM while eIF2Bβδγε was 20 nM. (C) Western blot of purified protein recovered after incubation with eIF2B(αβδγε)2 immobilized on anti-protein C antibody conjugated resin. eIF2Bα was protein C tagged. (D) Plot of fluorescence polarization signal before (black) and after incubation of FAM-ISRIB (2.5 nM) with 100 nM eIF2B(αβδγε)2 (red) or 100 nM eIF2B(αβδγε)2 + 6.0 μM eIF2α-P and varying concentrations of eIF2 (blue). For elution samples in (C), eIF2β, eIF2Bε, and eIF2Bα, and the eIF2Bδ and eIF2α-P blots are from the same gels, respectively. For input samples eIF2β and eIF2Bα, and the eIF2Bδ and eIF2α-P blots are from the same gels, respectively; eIF2Bε is from its own gel. Biological replicates: (A, B) n = 2; (D) n = 3. All error bars represent s.e.m.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.. eIF2α-P decreases the initial velocity of eIF2B’s guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity.
(A–E) Initial velocity of the eIF2B GEF reaction under varying conditions. Initial velocity was determined by a linear fit to timepoints acquired from 50 to 200 s (AC) or 400–1000 s (DE) after addition of eIF2B. For (AE), representative replicates of n = 2 biological replicates are shown.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. eIF2α-P binding conformationally inactivates eIF2B.
(A) Overlay of the ISRIB-bound eIF2B structure (PDB ID: 6CAJ) to the eIF2α-P-bound eIF2B structure (PDB ID: 6O9Z). The 7.5° hinge movement between the two eIF2B halves was measured between the lines connecting eIF2Bε H352 and P439 in the ISRIB-bound versus eIF2α-P-bound structures. (B) Zoom-in view of the ISRIB binding pocket upon eIF2α-P binding. The ~2 Å pocket lengthening was measured between eIF2Bδ and eIF2Bδ′ L482; the ‘prime’ to indicate the subunit of the opposing tetramer. ISRIB is shown in stick representation. (C) Overlay of eIF2-bound eIF2B (PDB ID: 6O85) and eIF2α-P-bound eIF2B. The 2.6 Å widening of the eIF2 binding site induced by eIF2α-P binding was measured between E139 and R250 of eIF2Bβ and eIF2Bδ′, respectively. The side chains involved in the key cation–π interaction between R250 in eIF2Bδ and Y81 in eIF2α that is lost due to pocket expansion are shown. (D) Overlay of the eIF2-bound eIF2B to the eIF2α-P-bound eIF2B. The 5.5 Å narrowing of the eIF2α-P binding pocket causing a steric clash between eIF2Bα and eIF2α-P in the eIF2-bound state was measured between eIF2Bα S77 and eIF2Bδ L314. ISRIB-bound eIF2B is colored in gold, eIF2α-P-bound eIF2B in blue, and eIF2-bound eIF2B in light green. eIF2α-P is shown in pink and eIF2α in red. ISRIB is colored in CPK.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.. Cryo-electron microscopy workflow for apo-eIF2B decamer.
(A) Representative micrograph showing the quality of data used for the final reconstruction of the apo eIF2B structure. (B) Data processing scheme of the apo eIF2B. (C) Fourier shell correlation (FSC) plots of the 3D reconstructions of the apo eIF2B masked (dark blue), unmasked (orange), and map to model (yellow). (D) Orientation angle distribution of the apo eIF2B reconstruction. (E) Local resolution map of the apo eIF2B showing that the peripheral regions of the γ and α subunits are dynamic. (F) Electron microscopy maps of different regions of the apo eIF2B structure showing the quality of the data and the fit of the model. Regions close to the core (chain D, on the left) are well-resolved and have clear density for most side chains; regions close to the periphery of the molecule (chains A and I, middle and right) are less well-resolved due to higher flexibility.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2.. ISRIB binding induces local pocket changes.
(A) Overlay of ISRIB-bound eIF2B (PDB ID: 6CAJ) to the apo eIF2B (PDB ID: 7L70) showing both structures share a similar global conformation. (B) Zoom-in view of the ISRIB binding pocket showing that in the apostate L179 occupies a position in the ISRIB binding pocket that would clash with ISRIB binding. H188 changes its rotameric conformation upon ISRIB binding. The apo eIF2B is shown in green, and the ISRIB-bound eIF2B in gold. ISRIB is shown in stick representation, colored in CPK.
Figure 7—figure supplement 3.
Figure 7—figure supplement 3.. eIF2-P binding pulls IF4 away but leaves IF1–IF3.
Overlay of eIF2-bound eIF2B (PDB ID: 6O85) and eIF2α-P-bound eIF2B (PDB ID: 6O9Z). IF4 is pulled away from IF3 by 2.6 Å but IF1 (eIF2Bε Catalytic and eIF2γ), IF2 (eIF2Bε Core and eIF2γ), and IF3 (eIF2Bβ and eIF2α) remain available for eIF2 binding. eIF2α-P-bound eIF2B is shown in blue and eIF2-bound eIF2B in light green. eIF2γ is shown in purple, eIF2β in pink, and eIF2α in red. ISRIB is colored in CPK.
Figure 7—figure supplement 4.
Figure 7—figure supplement 4.. Re-refinement of the ISRIB-bound eIF2B decamer.
(A) The distal portion of the original model eIF2Bα from the ISRIB-bound eIF2B decamer placed within EMDB:7443 after lowpass filtering to 3.0 Å resolution. There is a helix (amino acids 44–56) out of place. The average CC value for the chains belonging to eIF2Bα from this model is ~0.74. (B) After manual adjustments in Coot and re-refinement in phenix.real_space_refine, this short helix is placed inside the cryo-electron microscopy (EM) density with an average CC value for the chains belonging to eIF2Bα of ~0.77. (C) The map-to-model Fourier shell correlation plots of the updated model. EM validation report.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. Model for modulation of eIF2B activity.
ISRIB and eIF2 binding to eIF2B stabilize the active, ‘wings up’ conformation of eIF2B (A-State) while both eIF2-P (as well as eIF2α-P alone; not shown) stabilize the inactive ‘wings down’ conformation of eIF2B (I-State), which cannot engage ISRIB and exhibits reduced enzymatic activity and eIF2 binding (akin to an eIF2Bβδγε tetramer). As indicated by the structure of the apo eIF2B decamer, the conformational equilibrium in the absence of ligand likely favors the A-State, which is further stabilized by substrate eIF2 and/or ISRIB binding but antagonized by eIF2-P binding.
Author response image 1.
Author response image 1.

References

    1. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adomavicius T, Guaita M, Zhou Y, Jennings MD, Latif Z, Roseman AM, Pavitt GD. The structural basis of translational control by eIF2 phosphorylation. Nature Communications. 2019;10:2136. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10167-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Algire MA, Maag D, Lorsch JR. Pi release from eIF2, not GTP hydrolysis, is the step controlled by start-site selection during eukaryotic translation initiation. Molecular Cell. 2005;20:251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkin JD, Farg MA, Walker AK, McLean C, Tomas D, Horne MK. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and induction of the unfolded protein response in human sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiology of Disease. 2008;30:400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.02.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bogorad AM, Lin KY, Marintchev A. Novel mechanisms of eIF2B action and regulation by eIF2α phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2017;45:11962–11979. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx845. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources