Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;39(7):690-702.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01106-8. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

Convolutional neural network for classifying primary liver cancer based on triple-phase CT and tumor marker information: a pilot study

Affiliations

Convolutional neural network for classifying primary liver cancer based on triple-phase CT and tumor marker information: a pilot study

Hirotsugu Nakai et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop convolutional neural network (CNN) models for differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and predicting histopathological grade of HCC.

Materials and methods: Preoperative computed tomography and tumor marker information of 617 primary liver cancer patients were retrospectively collected to develop CNN models categorizing tumors into three categories: moderately differentiated HCC (mHCC), poorly differentiated HCC (pHCC), and ICC, where the histopathological diagnoses were considered as ground truths. The models processed manually cropped tumor with and without tumor marker information (two-input and one-input models, respectively). Overall accuracy was assessed using a held-out dataset (10%). Area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for differentiating ICC from HCCs (mHCC + pHCC), and pHCC from mHCC were also evaluated. We assessed two radiologists' performance without tumor marker information as references (overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity). The two-input model was compared with the one-input model and radiologists using permutation tests.

Results: The overall accuracy was 0.61, 0.60, 0.55, 0.53 for the two-input model, one-input model, radiologist 1, and radiologist 2, respectively. For differentiating pHCC from mHCC, the two-input model showed significantly higher specificity than radiologist 1 (0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.83] vs 0.45 [95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.63]; p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Our CNN model with tumor marker information showed feasibility and potential for three-class classification within primary liver cancer.

Keywords: Cholangiocellular carcinoma; Computed tomography; Deep learning; Hepatocellular cancer; Tumor grading; X-ray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590 . - DOI
    1. Weber SM, Ribero D, O’Reilly EM, et al. Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. Am J Med Sci. 2015;17:669–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12441 . - DOI
    1. Oishi K, Itamoto T, Amano H, et al. Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:311–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20661 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, et al. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018: imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients. Radiology. 2018;289:816–30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181494 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Seo N, Kim DY, Choi J-Y. Cross-sectional imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: development, growth, spread, and prognosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W64–75. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16923 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources