Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 10.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0072. Online ahead of print.

Benefits, limitations, and controversies on patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) and the evidence behind the practice

Huub H van Rossum  1   2 , Andreas Bietenbeck  3 , Mark A Cervinski  4   5 , Alex Katayev  6 , Tze Ping Loh  7 , Tony C Badrick  8
Affiliations

Benefits, limitations, and controversies on patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) and the evidence behind the practice

Huub H van Rossum et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the "old" average of normals concept, now generally referred to as moving average quality control (MA QC) or patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC). However, there are some controversies regarding PBRTQC which this review aims to address while also indicating the current status of PBRTQC.

Content: This review gives the background of certain newly described optimization and validation methods. It also indicates how QC plans incorporating PBRTQC can be designed for greater effectiveness and/or (cost) efficiency. Furthermore, it discusses controversies regarding the complexity of obtaining PBRTQC settings, the replacement of iQC, and software functionality requirements. Finally, it presents evidence of the added value and practicability of PBRTQC.

Outlook: Recent developments in, and availability of, simulation methods to optimize and validate laboratory-specific PBRTQC procedures have enabled medical laboratories to implement PBRTQC in their daily practice. Furthermore, these methods have made it possible to demonstrate the practicability and added value of PBRTQC by means of two prospective "clinical" studies and other investigations. Although internal QC will remain an essential part of any QC plan, applying PBRTQC can now significantly improve its performance and (cost) efficiency.

Keywords: average of normals; moving average; patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC); quality assurance; quality control.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lindberg, DA. Collection, evaluation, and transmission of hospital laboratory data. Methods Inf Med 1967;6:97–107.
    1. Cembrowski, GS. Use of patient data for quality control. Clin Lab Med 1986;6:715–33.
    1. Bull, BS, Elashoff, RM, Heilbron, DC, Couperus, J. A study of various estimators for the derivation of quality control procedures from patient erythrocyte indices. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;61:473–81.
    1. van Rossum, HH. Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:773–82.
    1. Katayev, A, Fleming, JK. Past, present, and future of laboratory quality control: patient- based real-time quality control or when getting more quality at less cost is not wishful thinking. J Lab Precis Med 2020;5:28.

LinkOut - more resources