Neoatherosclerosis - Long-Term Assessment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
- PMID: 33693100
- PMCID: PMC7897685
- DOI: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0100
Neoatherosclerosis - Long-Term Assessment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
Abstract
Although metallic stents improved the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), even the latest generation of drug-eluting stents (DES) is still limited by several factors. The limitations of DES are mainly related to the permanent metallic caging in vessel, chronic inflammatory response to the polymer and adverse effects of antiproliferative drug on endothelial tissue, leading to impaired physiological vasomotor response and late stent-related adverse events such as stent thrombosis and neoatherosclerosis. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS; Abbott Vascular) was designed to overcome these drawbacks of DES by disappearing from the vessel wall. Absorb BVS, however, was withdrawn from the world market because of increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis compared with DES. Importantly, only very limited long-term post-BVS implantation data are available, especially with regard to neoatherosclerosis, which can lead to very late adverse events even after resorption of the scaffold. Therefore, the goal of this review was to highlight the mid to long term clinical outcomes published to date, and to describe the features of the intimal healing process and neoatherosclerosis in the 5 years following Absorb BVS implantation, mainly based on our previous study. This may provide important information on the pathophysiology of the scaffolded vessel for clinicians, and promote identification of future bioresorbable materials for PCI that will minimize the stimulus for neoatherosclerosis.
Keywords: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold; Neoatherosclerosis; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Copyright © 2019, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, et al.. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease: Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496–501. - PubMed
-
- Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, Abizaid AS, Feres F, Pinto IM, et al.. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: A quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2001; 103: 192–195. - PubMed
-
- Weisz G, Leon MB, Holmes DR Jr, Kereiakes DJ, Popma JJ, Teirstein PS, et al.. Five-year follow-up after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Results of the SIRIUS (Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in De-Novo Native Coronary Lesions) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1488–1497. - PubMed
-
- Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y.. From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: Change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade? Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 16–25. - PubMed
-
- Otsuka F, Byrne RA, Yahagi K, Mori H, Ladich E, Fowler DR, et al.. Neoatherosclerosis: Overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 2147–2159. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous