Limiting radiation exposure during prostatic arteries embolization: influence of patient characteristics, anatomical conditions, and technical factors
- PMID: 33693993
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07844-7
Limiting radiation exposure during prostatic arteries embolization: influence of patient characteristics, anatomical conditions, and technical factors
Abstract
Objective: To assess the influence of patient characteristics, anatomical conditions, and technical factors on radiation exposure during prostatic arteries embolization (PAE) performed for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Materials and methods: Patient characteristics (age, body mass index (BMI)), anatomical conditions (number of prostatic arteries, anastomosis), and technical factors (use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), large display monitor (LDM), and magnification) were recorded as well as total air kerma (AK), dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), and number of acquisitions (NAcq). Associations between potential dose-influencing factors and AK using univariate analysis and a multiple linear regression model were assessed.
Results: Forty-one consecutive men (68 ± 8 years, min-max: 40-76) were included. LDM and CBCT decreased the use of small field of view with 13.9 and 3.8% respectively, both p < 0.001. The use of a LDM significantly reduced AK (1006.6 ± 471.7 vs. 1412 ± 754.6 mGy, p = 0.02), DAP (119.4 ± 64.4 vs. 167.9 ± 99.2, p = 0.04), FT (40.4 ± 11.5 vs. 53.6 ± 25.5 min, p = 0.01), and NAcq (16.3 ± 6.3 vs. 18.2 ± 7, p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, AK reduction was associated with lower patient BMI (β = 0.359, p = 0.002), shorter FT (β = 0.664, p < 0.001) and CBCT use (β = - 0.223, p = 0.03), and decreased NAcq (β = 0.229, p = 0.04).
Conclusion: LDM and CBCT are important technical dose-related factors to help reduce radiation exposure during PAE, and should be considered in standard practice.
Key points: • The use of large display monitor (LDM) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) both decreased the need for magnification during prostatic arteries embolization (PAE). • The use of LDM reduces radiation exposure during PAE. • Total air kerma is associated with patient's body mass index, fluoroscopy time, CBCT, and the number of acquisitions.
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Cone beam computed tomography; Interventional radiology; Prostatic artery embolization; Radiation exposure.
© 2021. European Society of Radiology.
References
-
- Ray AF, Powell J, Speakman MJ et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational study and propensity-matched comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate (the UK-ROPE study). BJU Int 122:270–282 - DOI
-
- Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Müllhaupt G et al (2018) Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ 361:k2338 - DOI
-
- Wang MQ, Duan F, Yuan K, Zhang GD, Yan J, Wang Y (2017) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: cone-beam CT in conjunction with DSA for identifying prostatic arterial anatomy. Radiology 282:271–280
-
- Laborda A, De Assis AM, Ioakeim I, Sánchez-Ballestín M, Carnevale FC, De Gregorio MA (2015) Radiodermitis after prostatic artery embolization: case report and review of the literature. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:755–759
-
- Andrade G, Khoury HJ, Garzón WJ et al (2017) Radiation exposure of patients and interventional radiologists during prostatic artery embolization: a prospective single-operator study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28:517–521 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical