Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;12(4):1175-1192.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01018-w. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Sulfonylurea Monotherapy: a Substudy of VERTIS CV

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Sulfonylurea Monotherapy: a Substudy of VERTIS CV

Krzysztof Strojek et al. Diabetes Ther. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Sulfonylureas (SU) are commonly used antihyperglycemic agents. VERTIS CV was the cardiovascular outcome study for the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ertugliflozin. Enrollment of patients in VERTIS CV occurred in two sequential cohorts (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2).

Methods: This substudy assessed the efficacy and safety of adding ertugliflozin to SU monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline at 18 weeks.

Results: Among the 8246 patients who were randomized in VERTIS CV, 157 patients in Cohort 1 and 135 patients in Cohort 2 were on SU monotherapy at baseline. In the prespecified analysis (Cohort 1 only), the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c change from baseline for placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg was - 0.56%, - 0.91%, and - 0.78%, respectively (placebo-adjusted LS mean [95% CI] change: - 0.35% [- 0.72%, 0.02%]; - 0.22% [- 0.60%, 0.16%] for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg, respectively; p > 0.05 for both). In a post-hoc analysis that included Cohorts 1 and 2 (N = 292), the LS mean HbA1c change from baseline at week 18 for placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg was - 0.31%, - 0.77%, and - 0.68%, respectively (placebo-adjusted change: - 0.46% [- 0.73%, - 0.18%]; - 0.37% [- 0.66%, - 0.09%]; p = 0.001 and 0.01 for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg, respectively). In Cohort 1, adverse events were reported in 45.8%, 47.3%, and 25.9% of patients with placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg. The incidence rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were 0.0%, 5.5%, and 3.7%, respectively, with no cases of severe hypoglycemia. The safety profile was similar for Cohorts 1 and 2 combined.

Conclusion: The addition of ertugliflozin to SU monotherapy reduced HbA1c but did not result in significant placebo-adjusted reductions from baseline according to the prespecified primary analysis (n = 157); however, in a post-hoc analysis with a larger patient population (n = 292), significant and clinically relevant HbA1c reductions were observed. Ertugliflozin was generally well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01986881.

Keywords: Glycemic; HbA1c; SGLT2 inhibitor; Secondary prevention; Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram (Cohort 1)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
LS mean change from baseline in HbA1c over time (Cohort 1)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Efficacy outcomes (Cohort 1): a LS mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 18; b LS mean change from baseline in FPG at week 18. Efficacy outcomes in the post-hoc analysis (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 combined); c LS mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 18; d LS mean change from baseline in FPG at week 18

References

    1. Proks P, Reimann F, Green N, Gribble F, Ashcroft F. Sulfonylurea stimulation of insulin secretion. Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 3):S368–S376. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.S368. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sola D, Rossi L, Schianca GP, et al. Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice. Arch Med Sci. 2015;11:840–848. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.53304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S98-S110. - PubMed
    1. Amod A. The place of sulfonylureas in guidelines: why are there differences? Diabetes Ther. 2020;11:5–14. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00811-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roglic G, Norris SL. Medicines for treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes and type of insulin in type 1 and type 2 diabetes in low-resource settings: synopsis of the World Health Organization Guidelines on second- and third-line medicines and type of insulin for the control of blood glucose levels in nonpregnant adults with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:394–397. doi: 10.7326/M18-1149. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources