Polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review of definitions, epidemiology and consequences
- PMID: 33694123
- PMCID: PMC8149355
- DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00479-3
Polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review of definitions, epidemiology and consequences
Abstract
Background: The number of older adults has been constantly growing around the globe. Consequently, multimorbidity and related polypharmacy have become an increasing problem. In the absence of an accepted agreement on the definition of polypharmacy, data on its prevalence in various studies are not easily comparable. Besides, the evidence on the potential adverse clinical outcomes related to polypharmacy is limited though polypharmacy has been linked to numerous adverse clinical outcomes. This narrative review aims to find and summarize recent publications on definitions, epidemiology and clinical consequences of polypharmacy.
Methods: The MEDLINE database was used to identify recent publications on the definition, prevalence and clinical consequences of polypharmacy using their respective common terms and their variations. Systematic reviews and original studies published between 2015 and 2020 were included.
Results: One hundred and forty-three definitions of polypharmacy and associated terms were found. Most of them are numerical definitions. Its prevalence ranges from 4% among community-dwelling older people to over 96.5% in hospitalized patients. In addition, numerous adverse clinical outcomes were associated with polypharmacy.
Conclusion: The term polypharmacy is imprecise, and its definition is yet subject to an ongoing debate. The clinically oriented definitions of polypharmacy found in this review such as appropriate or necessary polypharmacy are more useful and relevant. Regardless of the definition, polypharmacy is highly prevalent in older adults, particularly in nursing home residents and hospitalized patients. Approaches to increase the appropriateness of polypharmacy can improve clinical outcomes in older adults.
Keywords: Health outcomes; Inappropriate prescribing; Multimorbidity; Older adults; Polypharmacy.
Conflict of interest statement
MW was employed by AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, as director of discovery medicine (translational medicine) from 2003 to 2006, while on sabbatical leave from his professorship at the University of Heidelberg. Since returning to this position in January 2007, he has received lecturing and consulting fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Aspen, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers, Daichii-Sankyo, Lilly, Otsuka, Novo-Nordisk, Shire and LEO Pharma. FP declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- United Nations, D.o.E.a.S.A., Population Division (2020) World Population Ageing 2019 (ST/ESA/SER.A/444). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/agein.... Accessed 2 Nov 2020
-
- Mc Namara KP, et al. Health professional perspectives on the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy for older patients in Australia. Age Ageing. 2017;46(2):291–299. - PubMed
-
- Pazan F, Kather J, Wehling M. A systematic review and novel classification of listing tools to improve medication in older people. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;75(5):619–625. - PubMed
-
- Gutiérrez-Valencia M, Martínez-Velilla N, Vilches-Moraga A. Polypharmacy in older people: time to take action. Eur Geriatr Med. 2019;10(1):1–3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical