Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;30(3):590-609.
doi: 10.1111/inm.12855. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

Coercion in psychiatric and mental health nursing: A conceptual analysis

Etienne Paradis-Gagné  1 , Pierre Pariseau-Legault  2 , Marie-Hélène Goulet  1 , Jean Daniel Jacob  3 , Clara Lessard-Deschênes  1
Affiliations
Review

Coercion in psychiatric and mental health nursing: A conceptual analysis

Etienne Paradis-Gagné et al. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The use of coercion in psychiatric and mental health nursing is a major challenge, which can lead to negative consequences for nurses and patients, including rupture in the therapeutic relationship and risk of injury and trauma. The concept of coercion is complex to define and is used in different ways throughout the nursing literature. This concept is defined broadly, referring to both formal (seclusion, restraint, and forced hospitalization), informal (persuasion, threat, and inducement), and perceived coercion, without fully addressing its evolving conceptualizations and use in nursing practice. We conducted a concept analysis of coercion using Rodgers' evolutionary method to identify its antecedents, attributes, and associated consequences. We identified five main attributes of the concept: different forms of coercion; the contexts in which coercion is exercised; nurses' justification of its use; the ethical issues raised by the presence of coercion; and power dynamics. Our conceptual analysis shows the need for more nursing research in the field of coercion to achieve a better understanding of the power dynamics and ethical issues that arise in the presence of coercion.

Keywords: coercion; concept analysis; mental health nursing; psychiatric nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Allen, D. (2015). The Invisible Work of Nurses: Hospitals, Organisation and Healthcare. London: Routledge.
    1. Andersson, U., Fathollahi, J. & Gustin, L.W. (2020). Nurses’ experiences of informal coercion on adult psychiatric wards. Nursing Ethics, 27 (3), 741-753.
    1. Bigwood, S. & Crowe, M. (2008). ‘It’s part of the job, but it spoils the job’: A phenomenological study of physical restraint. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 17 (3), 215-222.
    1. Bowers, L., James, K., Quirk, A., Simpson, A., Stewart, D. & Hodsoll, J. (2015). Reducing conflict and containment rates on acute psychiatric wards: The Safewards cluster randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52 (9), 1412-1422.
    1. Bradbury, J., Hutchinson, M., Hurley, J. & Stasa, H. (2017). Lived experience of involuntary transport under mental health legislation. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 26 (6), 580-592.