Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:7:14.
doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021013. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

A long-term cross-sectional study with modified forgotten joint score to assess the perception of artificial joint after total knee arthroplasty

Affiliations

A long-term cross-sectional study with modified forgotten joint score to assess the perception of artificial joint after total knee arthroplasty

Karthik Chithartha et al. SICOT J. 2021.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The ultimate goal for an arthroplasty surgeon is to provide the patient a joint that feels more like a natural joint. The Modified Forgotten Joint Score (MFJS) is a newly introduced functional scoring system that has a superior ability to assess this property among arthroplasty patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term temporal association of the MFJS and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: We assessed 360 patients post TKA with MFJS questionnaire. The patient groups were distributed at follow-up intervals of 3 weeks (n = 55), 6 months (n = 45), 1 year (n = 57), 2 years (n = 40), 3 years (n = 49), 5 years (n = 49), 7 years (n = 39), and 10 years (n = 26). Higher score suggests a forgotten artificial joint.

Results: Post-operative mean MFJS scores were 64.4 ± 7.6 at 3 weeks, 87.7 ± 5.6 at 6 months, 89.2 ± 3.1 at 1 year, 89.9 ± 2.6 at 2 years, 89.4 ± 3.2 at 3 years, 89.1 ± 4 at 5 years, 84.5 ± 8.8 at 7 years, and 82.7 ± 11.9 at 10 years. The score at 3 weeks was significantly lesser than the average scores at other follow-up intervals. The score at 6 months was significantly higher compared to the score at 10 years. The average score at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years were significantly higher compared to the average score at 7 years and 10 years.

Conclusion: The trend of the MFJS score was found to drastically improve from 3 weeks to 6 months and peak in 2 years after which the score tends to attain a plateau up to 5 years following which there is a decline in the score at 7- and 10-years post-surgery. Age did not have an influence on the variation in functional score in any of the follow-up groups. MFJS has a strong positive correlation with the well-recognised KOOS scoring system.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: Forgotten joint score; Functional score; Long term; PROMs; Perception of joint; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The trend of the MFJS score at each follow-up interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pearson correlation between MFJS and KOOS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average age of the study group at each follow-up interval.

References

    1. Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A (2016) Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop 50, 518–522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bitton R (2009) The economic burden of osteoarthritis. Am J Manag Care 15, S230–S235. - PubMed
    1. Vaidya SV, Jogani AD, Pachore JA, Armstrong R, Vaidya CS (2020) India joining the world of hip and knee registries: Present status – a leap forward. Indian J Orthop 55, 1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris IA, Harris AM, Naylor JM, Adie S, Mittal R, Dao AT (2013) Discordance between patient and surgeon satisfaction after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28, 722–727. - PubMed
    1. Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O (2013) I can’t get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: Rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J 95-B, 148–152. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources