Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 11;23(5):42.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01482-7.

Cardiac Rehab in the COVID Era and Beyond: mHealth and Other Novel Opportunities

Elizabeth Epstein  1 , Neeja Patel  1 , Kathryn Maysent  1 , Pam R Taub  2
Affiliations
Review

Cardiac Rehab in the COVID Era and Beyond: mHealth and Other Novel Opportunities

Elizabeth Epstein et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) programs to close or limit their usual offerings. In order for patients to continue to benefit from CR, programs need to rapidly adapt to the current environment. This review highlights ways CR has evolved, and reviews the history of CR and recent advancements in telemedicine including remote patient monitoring, and mobile health that can be applied to CR.

Recent findings: Despite that initial studies indicate that home-based CR (HBCR) is safe and effective, HBCR has faced several challenges that have prevented it from becoming more widely implemented. Many previous concerns can now be addressed through the use of new innovations in home-based healthcare delivery. Since its inception, CR has become increasingly recognized as an important tool to improve patient mortality and quality of life in a broad range of cardiac diseases. While there has been little need to modify the delivery of CR since the 1950s, COVID-19 now serves as the necessary impetus to make HBCR an equal alternative to CBCR.

Keywords: COVID-19; Cardiac rehabilitation; Mobile health; Prevention; Secondary prevention; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Taub reports being a consultant for Amgen, Epirum Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and she is also a shareholder of Epirum Bio, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evolution of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) from its creation in the 1950s to the COVID era and beyond
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pashkow FJ. Issues in contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: a historical perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:822–834. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90116-I. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hellerstein HK, Ford AB. Rehabilitation of the cardiac patient. J Am Med Assoc. 1957;164:225–231. doi: 10.1001/jama.1957.02980030001001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FastStats. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm.
    1. The top 10 causes of death. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of....
    1. Balady GJ, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation programs. Circulation. 1994;90:1602–1607. - PubMed

Publication types