Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar-Apr;32(2):505-508.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007071.

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Adult Individuals With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

Marwan Aljohani  1   2 , Julian Yates  2 , Martin Ashley  2 , Lucy O'Malley  2
Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Adult Individuals With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

Marwan Aljohani et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to systematically review literature relating to the quality of life (QoL) in adult individuals with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) and identify which aspect of QoL adults with CLP find to be the most problematic, in comparison to a general non-cleft population.

Design: Different databases were searched for this review including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase. Five domains of QoL were identified to evaluate the overall results of these QoL measures. These domains were; physical function, physical pain, psychological implications and self-esteem, self-perception in relation to facial aesthetics, and social function. The studies included underwent critical appraisal and different types of bias were assessed based on the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.

Results: Ten studies were included in this review. The total number of participants was 541. The most common QoL measure for adults with CLP was Short-Form (SF-36). Seven studies out of 10 reported statistically significantly worse scores (P < 0.05) in the psychological implications and self-esteem domains of QoL in adults with CLP, indicating lower QoL in terms of these domains. The least affected QoL domain was physical function. A high heterogeneity was found among the studies, including variation in the QoL measures, types of orofacial clefts, types of treatment and comparison groups.

Conclusion: The presence of CLP did seem to negatively affect the QoL for adults with CLP, mainly in terms of psychological implications and self-esteem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Bister D, Set P, Cash C, et al. Incidence of facial clefts in Cambridge, United Kingdom. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33:372–376.
    1. Maarse W, Rozendaal AM, Pajkrt E, et al. A systematic review of associated structural and chromosomal defects in oral clefts: when is prenatal genetic analysis indicated? J Med Genet 2012; 49:490–498.
    1. Beluci ML, Genaro KF. Quality of life of individuals with cleft lip and palate pre- and post-surgical correction of dentofacial deformity. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2016; 50:217–223.
    1. Antonarakis GS, Patel RN, Tompson B. Oral health-related quality of life in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients: a systematic review. Community Dent Health 2013; 30:189–195.
    1. Kerce E. Quality of Life: Meaning, Measurement, and Models. 1992; http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a250813.pdf. Accessed October 23, 2018