Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248384.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248384. eCollection 2021.

Don't put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alexandra Masciantonio  1 , David Bourguignon  1 , Pierre Bouchat  1 , Manon Balty  1 , Bernard Rimé  2
Affiliations

Don't put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alexandra Masciantonio et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Prior studies indicated that actively using social network sites (SNSs) is positively associated with well-being by enhancing social support and feelings of connectedness. Conversely, passively using SNSs is negatively associated with well-being by fostering upward social comparison and envy. However, the majority of these studies has focused on Facebook. The present research examined the relationships between well-being-satisfaction with life, negative affect, positive affect-and using actively or passively various SNSs-Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok-during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, two mediators were tested: social support and upward social comparison. One thousand four persons completed an online survey during the quarantine measures; the analyses employed structural equation modeling. Results showed that passive usage of Facebook is negatively related to well-being through upward social comparison, whereas active usage of Instagram is positively related to satisfaction with life and negative affect through social support. Furthermore, active usage of Twitter was positively related to satisfaction with life through social support; while passive usage was negatively related to upward social comparison, which, in turn, was associated with more negative affect. Finally, TikTok use was not associated with well-being. Results are discussed in line with SNSs' architectures and users' motivations. Future research is required to go beyond methodological and statistical limitations and allow generalization. This study concludes that SNSs must be differentiated to truly understand how they shape human interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The estimated standardized parameters of the Facebook model.
Dashed lined indicate nonsignificant paths (p >.05). The three components of well-being were controlled–but not displayed—for gender and age: Age was associated with satisfaction with life (β = .26, p < .05), negative affect (β = -.33, p < .05), and positive affect (β = .20, p < .05); women had less positive affect (β = -.18, p < .05), and more negative affect (β = .12, p < .05).
Fig 2
Fig 2. The estimated standardized parameters of the Instagram model.
Dashed lined indicate nonsignificant paths (p >.05). The three components of well-being were controlled–but not displayed—for gender and age: Age was associated with satisfaction with life (β = .27, p < .05), negative affect (β = -.28, p < .05), and positive affect (β = .27, p < .05); women had less positive affect (β = -.18, p < .05), and more negative affect (β = .11, p < .05).
Fig 3
Fig 3. The estimated standardized parameters of the Twitter model.
Dashed lined indicate nonsignificant paths (p >.05). The three components of well-being were controlled–but not displayed—for gender and age: Age was associated with satisfaction with life (β = .26, p < .05), negative affect (β = -.33, p < .05), and positive affect (β = .26, p < .05); women had less positive affect (β = -.30, p < .05), and more negative affect (β = .14, p < .05).
Fig 4
Fig 4. The estimated standardized parameters of the TikTok model.
Dashed lined indicate nonsignificant paths (p >.05). The three components of well-being were controlled–but not displayed—for gender and age: women had less positive affect (β = -.30, p < .05), and more negative affect (β = .26, p < .05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine. 2000. September 15;51(6):843–57. 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jetten J, Haslam SA, Haslam C. The case for a social identity analysis of health and well-being. In: Jetten J, Haslam SA, Haslam C, editors. The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press; 2012. p. 1–19.
    1. Altena E, Baglioni C, Espie CA, Ellis J, Gavriloff D, Holzinger B, et al. Dealing with sleep problems during home confinement due to the COVID-19 outbreak: Practical recommendations from a task force of the European CBT-I Academy. Journal of Sleep Research. 2020;29(4):e13052. 10.1111/jsr.13052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatr [Internet]. 2020. March 6 [cited 2020 Sep 2];33(2). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061893/. 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casey N. How social networks can do good while we’re all trapped indoors. The Verge [Internet]. 2020. March 13; https://www.theverge.com/interface/2020/3/13/21176880/covid-19-quarantin....