Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Mar 11;8(3):e980.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000980. Print 2021 May.

B-Cell Activity Predicts Response to Glatiramer Acetate and Interferon in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

B-Cell Activity Predicts Response to Glatiramer Acetate and Interferon in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Sabine Tacke et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. .

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the predictive value of the enzyme-linked immunospot technique (ELISPOT) in identifying patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who will respond to treatment with glatiramer acetate (GA) or interferon-β (IFN-β), based on the brain-reactive B-cell activity of peripheral blood cells.

Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, real-world multicenter study, we identified patients with RRMS in the NeuroTransData MS registry and stratified them based on their documented treatment response (relapse-free in the first 12 months of treatment) to GA or IFN-β. The GA group comprised 73 patients who responded to GA and 35 nonresponders. The IFN-β group comprised 62 responders to IFN-β and 37 nonresponders. Patients with previous or current therapy affecting B-cell activity were excluded. We polyclonally stimulated mononuclear cells from peripheral blood samples (collected after participant selection) and investigated brain-reactive B-cell activity after incubation on brain tissue lysate-coated ELISPOT plates. Validity metrics of the ELISPOT testing results were calculated (Python 3.6.8) in relation to the clinical responsiveness in the 2 treatment groups.

Results: The ELISPOT B-cell activity assay showed a sensitivity of 0.74, a specificity of 0.76, a positive predictive value of 0.78, a negative predictive value of 0.28, and a diagnostic OR of 8.99 in predicting clinical response to GA vs IFN-β therapy in patients with RRMS.

Conclusion: Measurement of brain-reactive B-cell activity by ELISPOT provides clinically meaningful predictive probabilities of individual patients' treatment response to GA or IFN-β. The assay has the potential to improve the selection of optimal first-line treatment for individual patients with RRMS.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with RRMS, the brain reactivity of their peripheral-blood B cells predicts clinical response to GA and IFN-β.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time to (A) Relapse and (B) 3-Month EDSS CDP for Patients Defined by Treatment Response
Kaplan-Meier curves for patient strata defined by treatment response: responders defined by freedom from relapse within first 12 months of treatment with GA or IFN-β; nonresponders/failure defined as treatment failure on GA or IFN-β therapy (see text). Patient numbers indicate the number of patients within 3 months before and after the time indicated. CDP = confirmed disability progression; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; GA = glatiramer acetate; IFN-β = interferon-β.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves for Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Technique Test Results in (A) GA-Treated Patients, (B) IFN-β–Treated Patients, and (C) Combined for GA- and IFN-β–Treated Patients
The tables are the confusion matrices for a positive-outcome threshold of 4.5 spots. The study expected positive evidence of brain-related B-cell activity in GA responders and IFN-β nonresponders, and no evidence of B-cell activity in GA nonresponders or IFN-β responders. Responder: freedom from relapse activity within the first 12 months of GA or IFN-β treatment; nonresponder: treatment failure on GA or IFN-β therapy (see text). GA = glatiramer acetate; IFN-β = interferon-β; ROC = receiver operating characteristic curve.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time to (A) Relapse and (B) 3-Month EDSS CDP for Patients Defined by ELISPOT Result
Kaplan-Meier curves for patient strata defined by positive or negative ELISPOT results indicating presence or absence of in vivo brain-specific B-cell activity in patients on GA or IFN-β therapy. Patient numbers indicate the number of patients within 3 months before and after the time indicated. It was hypothesized that positive B-cell activity in patients treated with GA and negative B-cell activity in patients treated with IFN-β would be associated with better clinical outcome. CDP = confirmed disability progression; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; ELISPOT = enzyme-linked immunospot technique; GA = glatiramer acetate; IFN-β = interferon-β.

References

    1. Dendrou CA, Fugger L, Friese MA. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol 2015;15:545–558. - PubMed
    1. Giovannoni G, Turner B, Gnanapavan S, Offiah C, Schmierer K, Marta M. Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015;4:329–333. - PubMed
    1. Grossman I, Knappertz V, Laifenfeld D, et al. . Pharmacogenomics strategies to optimize treatments for multiple sclerosis: insights from clinical research. Prog Neurobiol 2017;152:114–130. - PubMed
    1. Teitelbaum D, Meshorer A, Hirshfeld T, Arnon R, Sela M. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by a synthetic polypeptide. Eur J Immunol 1971;1:242–248. - PubMed
    1. Webb C, Teitelbaum D, Arnon R, Sela M. In vivo and in vitro immunological cross- reactions between basic encephalitogen and synthetic basic polypeptides capable of suppressing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol 1973;3:279–286. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources