Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;20(1):158-169.
doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.158. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Attacking Key Performance Indicators in Soccer: Current Practice and Perceptions from the Elite to Youth Academy Level

Mat Herold  1   2 , Matthias Kempe  3 , Pascal Bauer  2   4 , Tim Meyer  1   2
Affiliations

Attacking Key Performance Indicators in Soccer: Current Practice and Perceptions from the Elite to Youth Academy Level

Mat Herold et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are used to evaluate the offensive success of a soccer team (e.g. penalty box entries) or player (e.g. pass completion rate). However, knowledge transfer from research to applied practice is understudied. The current study queried practitioners (n = 145, mean ± SD age: 36 ± 9 years) from 42 countries across different roles and levels of competition (National Team Federation to Youth Academy levels) on various forms of data collection, including an explicit assessment of twelve attacking KPIs. 64.3% of practitioners use data tools and applications weekly (predominately) to gather KPIs during matches. 83% of practitioners use event data compared to only 52% of practitioners using positional data, with a preference for shooting related KPIs. Differences in the use and value of metrics derived from positional tracking data (including Ball Possession Metrics) were evident between job role and level of competition. These findings demonstrate that practitioners implement KPIs and gather tactical information in a variety of ways with a preference for simpler metrics related to shots. The low perceived value of newer KPIs afforded by positional data could be explained by low buy-in, a lack of education across practitioners, or insufficient translation of findings by experts towards practice.

Keywords: Football; applied data-science; match analysis; performance analysis; soccer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Frequency of KPI use between levels of competition.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Frequency of use between KPIs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acar M., Yapicioglu B., Arikan N., Yalcin S., Ates N., Ergun M. (2008) Analysis of goals scored in the 2006 World Cup. Science and football VI Routledge. 261-268.
    1. Akenhead R., Nassis G.P. (2016) Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: current practice and perceptions. International journal of sports physiology and performance 11, 587-593. - PubMed
    1. Alves D.L., Osiecki R., Palumbo D.P., Moiano-Junior J.V., Oneda G., Cruz R. (2019) What variables can differentiate winning and losing teams in the group and final stages of the 2018 FIFA World Cup? International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport 19, 248-257.
    1. Andrienko G., Andrienko N., Budziak G., Dykes J., Fuchs G., von Landesberger T., Weber H. (2017) Visual analysis of pressure in football. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31, 1793-1839.
    1. Armatas V., Yiannakos A. (2010) Analysis and evaluation of goals scored in 2006 World Cup. Journal of Sport and Health Research 2, 119-128.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources