Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;9(4):306.
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4960.

An analytical study of drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse events among 165 COVID-19 patients

Affiliations

An analytical study of drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse events among 165 COVID-19 patients

Feng Sun et al. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has lasted for nearly 4 months by this study was conducted. We aimed to describe drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse drug events of COVID-19.

Methods: A retrospective, single-center case series study enrolled 165 consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were followed up until March 25, 2020, from a designated hospital in Wuhan. Patients were grouped by a baseline degree of severity: non-severe and severe. An analytical study of drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse events (AEs) of COVID-19 was conducted.

Results: Of the 165 COVID-19 cases, antivirals, antibacterials, glucocorticoids, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) were administered to 92.7%, 98.8%, 68.5%, and 55.2% of patients, respectively. The total kinds of drugs administered to the severe subgroup [26, interquartile range (IQR) 18-39] were 11 more than the non-severe subgroup (15, IQR 10-24), regardless of comorbidities. The 2 most common combinations of medications in the 165 cases were 'antiviral therapy + glucocorticoids + TCM' (81, 49.1%) and 'antiviral therapy + glucocorticoids' (23, 13.9%). Compared with non-severe cases, severe cases received more glucocorticoids (88.5% vs. 66.2%, P=0.02), but less TCM (50.0% vs. 63.3%, P=0.20), and suffered a higher percentage of death (34.6% vs. 7.2%, P=0.001). At the end of the follow-up, 130 (78.8%) patients had been discharged, and 24 (14.5%) died. There were 13 patients (7.9%) who had elevated liver enzymes, and 49 patients (29.7%) presented with worsening kidney function during the follow-up.

Conclusions: Of the 165 COVID-19 patients, the fatality rate remained high (14.5%). Drug utilization for COVID-19 was diverse and generally complied with the existing guidelines. Combination regimens containing antiviral drugs might be beneficial to assist COVID-19 recovery. Additionally, liver and kidney AEs should not be ignored.

Keywords: Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19); adverse events (AEs); disease progression; drug utilization; fatality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4960). Dr. SZ reports grants from National Key Technology R&D Program of China, grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China, grants from Special Project for Major Infectious Diseases of Peking University Health Science Center, during the conduct of the study. Dr. YC reports grants from Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, during the conduct of the study. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The total kinds of medications and disease progression for 165 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). (A) The total kinds of medications grouped by disease severity and comorbidities. Total kinds of medications refer to the medications (generic names) per person used during the whole hospitalization. Antivirals were defined as Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes starting with J05. (B) The disease progression for 165 patients since baseline. The patient’s baseline condition was classified into 4 levels according to the guidelines “Diagnostic and treatment protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (trial version 5)”: mild, general, severe, and critically severe, respectively.

References

    1. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020;395:565-74. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727-33. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phelan AL, Katz R, Gostin LO. The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan, China: Challenges for Global Health Governance. JAMA 2020;323:709-10. 10.1001/jama.2020.1097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, et al. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020;395:470-3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu XW, Wu XX, Jiang XG, et al. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series. BMJ 2020;368:m606. 10.1136/bmj.m606 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources