Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jul 15;149(2):403-408.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.33556. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Pegilodecakin as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1 or tyrosine kinase inhibitor in heavily pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Final results of cohorts A, G, H and I of IVY Phase I study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pegilodecakin as monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1 or tyrosine kinase inhibitor in heavily pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Final results of cohorts A, G, H and I of IVY Phase I study

Nizar M Tannir et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-10 has anti-inflammatory and CD8+ T-cell-stimulating properties. Pegilodecakin (pegylated recombinant human IL-10) induces intratumoral antigen-specific CD8 + T-cells and upregulates IFNγ and major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) I and II. Pegilodecakin has single-agent activity with manageable toxicity in advanced renal cell carcinama (aRCC) (data cutoff 24 March 2016). Pegilodecakin with pembrolizumab or nivolumab revealed clinical activity in aRCC (data cutoff 1 July 2018). Here, we report for the first time the results of pegilodecakin+ pazopanib, and final results for monotherapy and long-term follow-up with pegilodecakin + anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) inhibitors (data cutoff 19 February 2019). Phase 1/1b multi-cohort dose escalation IVY study enrolled 353 patients. Sixty-six patients with aRCC were treated with pegilodecakin alone or with pazopanib or anti-PD-1 inhibitor in cohorts A, G, H and I (data cutoff 19 February 2019). Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoint was tumor response by immune-related response criteria (irRC). Pegilodecakin plus nivolumab or pembrolizumab yielded median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 13.9 months and 6-month PFS probability of 60%, 76% 1-year overall survival (OS) probability and 61% 2-year OS probability. Pegilodecakin monotherapy produced mPFS of 1.8 months, 6-month PFS probability 25%, 1-year OS 50%, and 2-year OS 17%. Median OS was not reached in both combinations. Objective response rates (ORRs) were 33% with pazopanib and 43% with anti-PD-1. Most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events included anemia, thrombocytopenia and hypertriglyceridemia. In these heavily pretreated renal cell carcinama cohorts of IVY, pegilodecakin+anti-PD-1 inhibitor showed promising clinical activity. Safety profile of pegilodecakin alone and with anti-PD-1 inhibitors was consistent as previously reported.

Keywords: nivolumab; pegilodecakin; pegylated IL-10; pembrolizumab; renal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by the authors. Nizar M. Tannir: Personal honorarium fees: Eli Lilly and Company; personal fees and/or grants outside the submitted work from Eisai Medical Research, Nektar Therapeutics, Exelixis, Inc., Oncorena, Calithera Bioscience, Surface Oncology, Novartis, and Ipsen. Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos: Research Funding: Abbvie, Amgen, ArQule, ARMO BioSciences, ADC Therapeutics, Anheart, 3D Medicines, Basilia, Bayer, Calithera Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, F‐star, Incyte, Jounce Therapeutics, Linnaeus, Mabspace Biosciences, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, MedImmune, Mersana, Peleton Therapeutics, Regeneron, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Treadwell Therapeutics, and Tempest Therapeutics. Advisory Board Fees: Arqule, Basilia, Bayer. Deborah J. Wong: Grant/research funding paid to institution: ARMO BioSciences, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, and Eli Lilly and Company. Raid Aljumaily: Consulting or Advisory Role outside the submitted work: AstraZeneca and Regeneron. Alexandra Drakaki: No conflict of interest related to this manuscript. Johanna Bendell: Research Funding During the Conduct of the Study: Eli Lilly and Company. Research Grants Outside the Submitted Work: EMD Serono, Koltan, SynDevRex, Forty Seven, Abbvie, Onyx, Takeda, Eisai, Celldex, CytomX, Nektar, Boston Biomedical, Tarveda, Tyrogenex, Marshall Edwards, Pieris, Mersana, Calithera, Blueprint, Merus, Jacobio, Effector, Novocare, Arrys, Tracon, Sierra, Therapeutics, Vyriad, Harpoon, ADC, Millennium, Imclome, Acerta Pharma, Rgenix, Bellicum, Gossamer Bio, Arcus Bio, Tempest Tx, Shattuck Labs, Synthorx, Inc, Revolution Medicines, Inc., Zymeworks, AtlasMedx, Scholar Rock, NGM Biopharma, Treadwell Therapeutics, IGM Biosciences, Mabspace, REPARE Therapeutics, NeoImmune Tech. Research Grants and Other Outside the Submitted Work: Gilead, Genentech/Roche, BMS, Five Prime, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, MedImmune, Celgene, Taiho, Macrogenics, GSK, Novartis, OncoMed, LEAP, TG Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BI, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Incyte, Apexigen, Array, Sanofi, Agios, ARMO BioSciences a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Ipsen, Merrimack, Oncogenex, Evelo, FORMA, Innate, Arch Oncology, Prelude Therapeutics, Amgen, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Bicycle Therapeutics, Relay Therapeutics. Consulting Fees to Institution: Phoenix Bio, Cyteir, Molecular Partners, Torque, Tizona, Janssen, Tolero, TD2 (Translational Drug Development), Moderna Therapeutics, Tanabe Research Laboratories, Beigene, Continuum Clinical, Amgen, Evelo, Piper Biotech, Samsung Bioepios, Fusion Therapeutics. Annie Hung, Manuel Afable, Jong Seok Kim, David Ferry: Employees of Eli Lilly and Company with stock holdings during the conduct of the study. Aung Naing; Research funding: NCI, EMD Serono, MedImmune, Healios Onc. Nutrition, Atterocor, Amplimmune, ARMO BioSciences, Eli Lilly, Kaeryopharm Therapeutics, Incyte, Novartis, Regeneron, Merck, BMS, Pfizer, CytomX Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Calithera Biosciences, TopAlliance Biosciences, Kymab, PsiOxus, Arcus Biosciences, NeoimmuneTech, ImmuneOcia, Surface Oncology. Advisory board: CytomX Therapeutics, Novartics and Genome & Company, OncoSec KEYNOTE‐695, STCube Pharmaceuticals, Kymab. Travel and accommodation expenses: Armo Biosciences. Spouse: research funding from Immunde Deficiency Foundation, Jeffery Modell Foundation and Chao Physician‐scientist, and Baxalta; Advisory Board for Takeda, CSL Behring, and Horizon Pharma.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient response. A, Waterfall plot depicting change in tumor burden immune‐related response criteria (irRC) from pegilodecakin monotherapy (blue bars), pegilodecakin+pazopanib (red bars) or pegilodecakin+anti‐PD‐1 (green bars) therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The waterfall plot includes 57 of 58 evaluable patients. One patient from the anti‐PD‐1 cohort had only nonmeasurable lesions and could not be included in the analysis. “*” symbol indicates patients who had a partial response per tumor response assessment based on irRC. § symbol indicates anti‐PD‐1 inhibitors that include pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Best overall response per irRC is displayed in a table inset for each cohort. ORR, overall response rate; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. B, Spider plot depicting change in tumor burden per irRC in pegilodecakin monotherapy (blue), pegilodecakin+anti‐PD‐1 (green) and pegilodecakin+pazopanib (red) cohorts in patients with RCC. Median duration of response (mDOR) in months is displayed in table inset for all cohorts. NR, not reached. C, Kaplan‐Meier plot of overall survival for pegilodecakin monotherapy (blue), pegilodecakin+anti‐PD‐1 (green)and pegilodecakin+pazopanib (red) in all evaluable patients with RCC. Number of patients at risk over time is displayed below the plot. Table inset displays 1‐year, 2‐year and median overall survival probabilities. NR, not reached. D, Kaplan‐Meier plot of progression‐free survival for pegilodecakin monotherapy (blue), pegilodecakin+anti‐PD‐1 (green) and pegilodecakin+pazopanib (red) in all evaluable patients with RCC. Number of patients at risk over time is displayed below the plot. Table inset displays median PFS (mPFS) and 6‐month probability

References

    1. Hasanov E, Gao J, Tannir NM. The immunotherapy revolution in kidney cancer treatment: scientific rationale and first‐generation results. Cancer J. 2020;26(5):419‐431. - PubMed
    1. Atkins MB, Tannir NM. Current and emerging therapies for first‐line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;70:127‐137. - PubMed
    1. Tannir NM, Pal SK, Atkins MB. Second‐line treatment landscape for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review. Oncologist. 2018;23(5):540‐555. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, George S, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: updated results with long‐term follow‐up of the randomized, open‐label, phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial. Cancer. 2020;126(18):4156‐4167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chowdhury SMD, Voss MH, Hawkins RE, et al. A phase I/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of pazopanib (PAZ) and pembrolizumab (PEM) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:4506.

Publication types

MeSH terms