Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul-Aug;32(5):1898-1900.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007621.

Modified Nasoseptal Rescue Flap Technique for Pituitary Adenoma Resection via Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

Affiliations

Modified Nasoseptal Rescue Flap Technique for Pituitary Adenoma Resection via Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

Jiantao Zheng et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Nasoseptal rescue flap (NSRF), which preserves the pedicle of the flap and is harvested as a nasoseptal flap (NSF) when intraoperative leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) occurs, is an alternative strategy for skull base reconstruction in patients with pituitary adenoma resection via an endoscopic endonasal approach. However, in practice, the original NSRF technique cannot meet the needs during operation. Therefore, the authors aimed to describe a modified NSRF technique for the resection of pituitary adenoma via endoscopic endonasal approach and to examine its utility and outcomes. The authors retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 87 consecutive patients with pituitary adenoma who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery performed using NSRF technique from September 2019 to August 2020. Data on intraoperative CSF leakage, NSF conversion rate, and reconstruction-related complications were analyzed. The average age of patients was 50.1 years (men, 50.5%). Twenty-five cases of intraoperative CSF leakage were observed: 23 cases of low-flow CSF leakage and two cases of high-flow CSF leakage. NSRF was converted to NSF in 11 cases. Two patients experienced postoperative CSF leakage after reconstruction without NSF and required unplanned reoperation to rebuild the skull base with NSF. In conclusion, this modified NSRF utilized a minimally invasive way to provide sufficient surgical corridor without the need for pedicle retraction, and it can be effectively converted to an NSF for skull base reconstruction in patients with pituitary adenoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:1882–1886.
    1. Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63:ONS44–ONS52.
    1. Reuter G, Bouchain O, Demanez L, et al. Skull base reconstruction with pedicled nasoseptal flap: technique, indications, and limitations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47:29–32.
    1. Soudry E, Psaltis AJ, Lee KH, et al. Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2015; 125:80–85.
    1. Rivera-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, et al. Nasoseptal “rescue” flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2011; 121:990–993.