Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation
- PMID: 33712085
- PMCID: PMC7953690
- DOI: 10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2
Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation
Abstract
Background: Infertility history may have important implications for clinical practice and scientific discovery. Previous research on the validity of self-reported infertility measurements has been limited in scope and duration (< 5 years). In this study, we validated self-reported infertility history measures 15-23 years after fertility treatment initiation among women who utilized assisted reproductive technology (ART).
Methods: Women who received ART treatments from three Boston infertility clinics and who enrolled in a prior study (1994-2003) were re-contacted in 2018 for the AfteR Treatment Follow-up Study (ART-FS). Infertility history was collected from clinical records and two self-report questionnaires (at ART initiation and at ART-FS enrollment). Treatment history included specific details (fresh or frozen embryo transfers, number of cycles) and treatment recall prior to ART initiation. Self-reported infertility diagnoses included polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, uterine factor infertility, tubal factor infertility, diminished ovarian reserve/advanced maternal age, male factor infertility, and other/unknown. We compared self-reported measures from 2018 to self-reported and clinical data from prior study initiation, using Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Of 2644 women we attempted to recontact, 808 completed the ART-FS, with an average follow-up of 19.6 years (standard deviation: 2.7). Recall of fertility treatment usage had moderate sensitivity (IVF = 0.85, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.81) but low specificity across different infertility treatment modalities (IVF = 0.63, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.55). Specific IVF details had low to moderate validity and reliability with clinical records. Reliability of recalled infertility diagnosis was higher when compared to self-report at ART initiation (PCOS K = 0.66, Endometriosis K = 0.76, Tubal K = 0.73) than when compared to clinical records (PCOS K = 0.31, Endometriosis K = 0.48, Tubal K = 0.62) and varied by diagnosis.
Conclusions: The ability of women to recall specific IVF treatment details was moderately accurate and recall of self-reported infertility diagnosis varied by diagnosis and measurement method.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; InVitro fertilization; Endometriosis; Epidemiology; Fertility; Fertility treatment; infertility; validity; reliability; Polycystic ovary syndrome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006. PMID: 23074488 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted reproductive technology treatment increases obstetric and neonatal risks over that of the underlying infertility diagnosis.Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1223-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35397876 Free PMC article.
-
Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates.Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec;31(12):2750-2755. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew247. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27738114 Free PMC article.
-
Age-related natural fertility outcomes in women over 35 years: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1808-1820. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa129. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32696041
-
Advances in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research Applications for Female Infertility-Mechanisms, Efficacy Parameters, Challenges and Future Roadmap.Galen Med J. 2024 Oct 8;13:e3632. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v13i.3632. eCollection 2024. Galen Med J. 2024. PMID: 39483858 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Association of infertility with type and timing of menopause: a prospective cohort study.Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep 5;38(9):1843-1852. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead143. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37451681 Free PMC article.
-
Integrative regression modeling of insulin sensitivity, resistance, and beta-cell dysfunction in predicting female infertility: a cross-sectional NHANES study.Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jun 30;25(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01755-3. Clin Exp Med. 2025. PMID: 40586983 Free PMC article.
-
Infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, and risk of stroke: pooled analysis of individual patient data of 618 851 women.BMJ. 2022 Jun 22;377:e070603. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070603. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35732311 Free PMC article.
-
Unilateral Oophorectomy and Age at Natural Menopause: A Longitudinal Community-Based Cohort Study.BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):337-345. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17980. Epub 2024 Oct 10. BJOG. 2025. PMID: 39389913 Free PMC article.
-
Association of lifetime lactation and characteristics of menopause: a longitudinal cohort study.BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):3112. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20508-7. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39529030 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: Data from the National Survey of family growth. Natl Health Stat Report. 2013(67):1–18. - PubMed
-
- Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of family growth, 1982-2010. Natl Health Stat Report 2014(73):1–21. - PubMed
-
- Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G, Kissin D. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004;53(1):1–20. - PubMed
-
- Sunderam S, Chang J, Flowers L, Kulkarni A, Sentelle G, Jeng G, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009;58(5):1–25. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources