Military medical research on internal diseases in modern warfare: new concepts, demands, challenges, and opportunities
- PMID: 33712087
- PMCID: PMC7953602
- DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00313-8
Military medical research on internal diseases in modern warfare: new concepts, demands, challenges, and opportunities
Abstract
Battlefield internal medicine aims at the treatment of combatants and noncombatants with various internal diseases on the battlefield. The military medical research on battlefield internal diseases focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical management, and prevention of internal diseases under military war conditions. In both wartime and peacetime, the soldiers suffer from more internal diseases than surgical wounds. With the introduction of high-tech weapons, including chemical, physical, and biological agents, a large number of special internal illnesses and casualties will appear in future wars. The battles often occur in special environments, such as high or low temperatures, plateau or polar areas, and micro- or hyper-gravity. The current theories of battlefield internal medicine are mainly derived from wars decades ago and cannot meet the needs of military medical support under the conditions of modern warfare. Therefore, the military medical research on battlefield internal medicine should be based on contemporary military situations, focus on the purpose of treating battlefield internal diseases, and adhere to the actual needs of the troops in peacetime and wartime. We should investigate the pathogenesis of battlefield internal diseases and explore the threats that may arise in future wars to ensure the advancement of battlefield internal medicine. This review highlights new concepts, demands, challenges, and opportunities for the further development of military medical research on battlefield internal medicine.
Keywords: Internal diseases; Military medicine; Modern battlefield.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Howard JT, Kotwal RS, Stern CA, Janak JC, Mazuchowski EL, Butler FK, Stockinger ZT, Holcomb BR, Bono RC, Smith DJ. Use of combat casualty care data to assess the US military trauma system during the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts, 2001-2017. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):600–608. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Qian GS. Efforts to improve the level of battlefield medical research in our army. People's Mil Surg. 2008;51(10):623–624. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9736.2008.10.001. - DOI
-
- Zhang DX, He FC. Exploration and practice of strengthening the construction of military medical discipline. People's Mil Surg. 2008;6:397–398. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9736.2008.06.040. - DOI
-
- Blackbourne LH, Baer DG, Eastridge BJ, Butler FK, Wenke JC, Hale RG, Kotwal RS, Brosch LR, Bebarta VS, Knudson MM, Ficke JR, Jenkins D, Holcomb JB. Military medical revolution: military trauma system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S388–S394. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827548df. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
