Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Sep;32(9):1725-1733.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05906-6. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

Regional and gender-specific analyses give new perspectives for secular trend in hip fracture incidence

Affiliations
Observational Study

Regional and gender-specific analyses give new perspectives for secular trend in hip fracture incidence

S-R Pekonen et al. Osteoporos Int. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

In this study, we found that regional disparity in incidence of hip fractures has converged. Also, annual hip fracture risk ratios between genders have systematically diminished over time.

Introduction: Several studies have reported secular trends in hip fracture incidence, but knowledge about the possible causes is limited. We studied potential explanations by examining spatio-temporal epidemiology of the fractures and estimating relative risks between genders.

Methods: This observational study was based on all inpatient hospital discharges in 1972-2018 in Finland. We divided the data by gender, 5-year age groups and Finnish sub-regions and estimated gender and age standardized spatio-temporal rates of hip fractures by using a Bayesian age-period-cohort model.

Results: In 1972, women's hip fracture incidence was 1.2-1.3 times higher in western and coastal Finland compared to eastern and inland areas. Also, women had approximately 1.7 times higher average risk to get a hip fracture compared to men. Today, the hip fracture differences between the areas have converged to insignificant and the relative risk between genders has diminished to 1.2. Age-specific relative risks indicate greater hip fracture risk for younger men and older women, and the women's risk increases beyond the risk of men at age 65 which is ten years later than in the beginning of the study period.

Conclusion: Incidence of hip fracture has converged significantly between regions and genders. Especially factors related with socioeconomic development and increased frailty and longevity seem to be important. The hip fracture incidence rate ratio between women and men has systematically decreased in time, and more attention should be paid to hip fracture risk in men in the future.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Fracture prevention; Fracture risk assessment; General population studies; Orthopaedics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Salla-Riikka Pekonen, Juho Kopra, Heikki Kröger, Toni Rikkonen and Reijo Sund declare that they have no conflict of interest. There has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced this outcome.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sub-regional hip fracture incidence rates standardized by age, cohort, and time period in Finland in every second year from 1972 to 2018 and scaled so that the overall mean rate corresponds to one. Finland is located in northern Europe, and borders with Scandinavian countries of Sweden and Norway in the west and Russia in the east. Baltic Sea surrounds Finland to the southwest
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparisons of regional hip fracture age-standardized incidence rates for 100,000 person years in men and women in Finland in 1972–2018. The shaded areas represent the 95% confidence intervals. The geographic divide to east/west and coast/inland are not mutually exclusive geographic regions but reflect two methods for partitioning the country. Subfigures (a) and (c) represent the gender-specific differences between eastern and western parts of the country, (b) and (d) between coastal and inland areas
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Age-standardized hip fracture incidence in Finland in 1972–2018 on the top (scale on the right). Below, women vs. men relative risk (age-standardized incidence rate ratio) by time, and (b) by age group during different time periods. Shaded grey areas show 95% confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1726–1733. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:2239–2256. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cauley JA, Chalhoub D, Kassem AM, Fuleihan GE. Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:338–351. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.51. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievänen H. Continuously declining incidence of hip fracture in Finland: analysis of nationwide database in 1970–2016. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;77:64–67. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbier S, Ecochard R, Schott A, et al. Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:371–377. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0687-y. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources