Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;29(9):4939-4947.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06108-w. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

A hypothesis for the pathogenesis of radiation-induced oral mucositis: when biological challenges exceed physiologic protective mechanisms. Implications for pharmacological prevention and treatment

Affiliations
Review

A hypothesis for the pathogenesis of radiation-induced oral mucositis: when biological challenges exceed physiologic protective mechanisms. Implications for pharmacological prevention and treatment

Stephen T Sonis. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Oral mucositis (OM) remains a significant unmet need for patients being treated with standard concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) regimens for head and neck cancers (HNC). OM's pathogenesis is complex and includes both direct and indirect damage pathways. In this paper, the field is reviewed with emphasis on the initiating and sustaining role of oxidative stress on OM's pathobiology. A hypothesis is presented which suggests that based on OM's clinical and biological trajectory, mucosal damage is largely the consequence of cumulative CRT-induced biological changes overwhelming physiologic self-protective mechanisms. Furthermore, an individual's ability to mount and maintain a protective response is dependent on interacting pathways which are primarily determined by a multiplex consisting of genomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics. Effective biologic or pharmacologic OM interventions are likely to supplement or stimulate existing physiologic damage-control mechanisms.

Keywords: Mucositis; Oxidative stress; Pathobiology; Radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Sonis reports personal fees from Biomodels, LLC, personal fees from Primary Endpoint Solutions, LLC (PES), outside of the submitted work. As an employee of Biomodels and PES, he is involved in assisting industry, government and academics in the study, and enablement of drugs, biologicals, and devices to treat patients for a broad range of indications including cancer and oral toxicities of cancer therapy. He does not have equity or receive payment from any of the companies’ clients. This review was funded in part by a grant to PES from Galera Therapeutics which is among the companies developing a mucositis intervention based on mitigating radiation-induced oxidative stress.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Differences in the clinical trajectory of oral mucositis between a bolus and fractionated stomatotoxic challenge: one blow from a sledgehammer vs. cumulative hits from a small ball peen hammer. The acuity of SOM development and resolution in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy such as in conditioning regimens for stem cell transplants contrasts dramatically with the slower onset, duration, and time to resolution observed in patients receiving typical regimens of fractionated doses of radiation for the treatment of head and neck cancers. While there is similarity in the underlying pathogenic mechanisms, the repetitive challenge of multiple radiation doses produces a cumulative biological effect that results in injury, i.e., one blow from a sledgehammer vs. repeated hits with a small hammer
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fractionated radiated challenge influences biological interactions and phenotype in the development of SOM. The biological sequence which delineates the pathogenesis of mucositis has been described as a linear 5-phase process (5,6): initiation (I), signaling (S), amplification (A), ulceration (U), and healing (H). The concept was originally proposed based on data obtained following challenges with bolus chemotherapy in humans or a single dose of high energy radiation in animals (Panel 1). The sequence also characterizes the biological response and course associated with each daily fraction of radiation experienced by patients being treated for cancers of the head and neck. Critically, however, in cases of fractionated dosing, the net clinical effect is not only a consequence of the linear events initiated by each fraction but more importantly by the vertical crosstalk which recognizes that the biological consequences of each fraction not only affect tissue horizontally but also modifies or is modified by cell function primed by earlier doses (Panel 2)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mucositis is the consequence of the cumulative biological effects of the radiation challenge exceeding the intrinsic capacity of physiological protective mechanisms. Increasing the threshold for a gain in biological protection results in consequent increase in the threshold for manifestations of mucosal injury. Interventional strategies that supplement protective mechanisms and pathways or those that stimulate intrinsic mechanisms to optimize their effectiveness have proven to be most effective.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lalla RV et al (2019) Oral mucositis due to high-dose chemotherapy and/or head and neck radiation therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2019(53):Igz011 - PubMed
    1. Maria OM, et al. Radiation-induced oral mucositis. Front Oncol. 2017;72:89. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowen J, Al-Dasooqi N, Bossi P, et al. The pathogenesis of mucositis: updated perspectives and emerging targets. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:4023–4033. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04893-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hongsheng Y, et al. Different responses of tumor and normal cells to low-dose radiation. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2013;17:356–362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wodarz D, Sorace R, Komarova NL. Dynamics of cellular responses to radiation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003513. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms