Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jun;48(6):738-744.
doi: 10.1111/joor.13167. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

Rehabilitation of shortened dental arches: A fifteen-year randomised trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Rehabilitation of shortened dental arches: A fifteen-year randomised trial

Michael Horst Walter et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Few long-term studies on treatments in the shortened dental arch (SDA) are available.

Objective: The objective of this trial was to analyse the long-term success of two different treatment concepts.

Methods: Patients over 35 years of age with missing molars in one jaw and at least the canine and one premolar present on both sides were eligible. In the partial removable dental prosthesis (PRDP) group (N = 81), molars and missing second premolars were replaced by a precision attachment retained prosthesis. In the SDA group (N = 71), the dental arch ended with the second premolar that had to be present or replaced by a cantilever fixed dental prosthesis. Follow-up examinations were carried out over 15 years.

Results: A comprehensive outcome variable comprised four failure categories for which Kaplan-Meier survival (success) analyses were conducted. Half of the patients exhibited a continuous preservation of the per protocol prosthetic status that remained totally unaffected by complications for more than 10 years. The event-free success rates for moderate or worse failure implied a loss of the per protocol prosthetic status. The respective survival rates fell below 50% at 14.2 years in the PRDP group and 14.3 years in the SDA group. In none of the analyses, a significant group difference was found.

Conclusions: In patients with an SDA condition, changes in the prosthetic status have to be expected. The affected proportion increases almost linearly from shortly after treatment and comprises the majority after 15 years. The influence of the examined treatments on success appears to be low.

Keywords: dental arch; dental prostheses; dental restauration failure; prosthesis survival; tooth loss; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. McLister C, Donnelly M, Cardwell CR, et al. Effectiveness of prosthodontic interventions and survival of remaining teeth in adult patients with shortened dental arches-a systematic review. J Dent. 2018;78(11):31-39.
    1. Fueki K, Baba K. Shortened dental arch and prosthetic effect on oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(7):563-572.
    1. Käyser AF. Shortened dental arches and oral function. J Oral Rehabil. 1981;8(5):457-462.
    1. Khan SB, Chikte UM, Omar R. An overview of systematic reviews related to aspects of the shortened dental arch and its variants in adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(4):357-366.
    1. McKenna G, Allen PF, O'Mahony D, et al. The impact of rehabilitation using removable partial dentures and functionally orientated treatment on oral health-related quality of life: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43(1):66-71.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources