A plea for a unified approach to sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy in Romania: results from a prospective multicentric trial
- PMID: 33713591
- DOI: 10.2478/rjim-2021-0011
A plea for a unified approach to sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy in Romania: results from a prospective multicentric trial
Abstract
Background. Adequate sedation is a prerequisite for quality endoscopic examination of the digestive tract. We aimed to evaluate the current practices and safety profile of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in Romania and its impact on the technical success of the procedure and procedure-related adverse events. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicentric, observational study including all patients undergoing digestive endoscopic procedures under various degrees of sedation. We collected data regarding the endoscopic procedure, type and degree of sedation, drug regimens, personnel in charge of sedation, and relevant patient related information. The main study outcome was the rate of sedation-related adverse events; secondary study outcomes included procedure-related adverse events and the impact of sedation on procedure success. Results. 1,043 consecutive endoscopic procedures from eight Romanian endoscopy units were included in our study. Sedation regimens were highly variable between participating centers, with 566 (54%) of procedures being performed under sedation provided by an anaesthesiologist. Sedation-related adverse events occurred in 40 cases (3.8%), most of them were mild respiratory and cardiovascular events and all reversed spontaneously. On multivariate analysis, male gender, procedure type (endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and deep sedation were risk factors for complications. The endoscopy unit, ASA status, age and type of sedative did not influence the complication rate. Conclusion. In conclusion, sedation for endoscopic procedures is generally safe, despite a high variability in sedation practices between centers in Romania. Establishing a national guideline on sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy will ensure consistent and safe practice for these procedures.
Keywords: anesthesiologist; complications; endoscopy; gastroenterologist; guidelines; sedation.
© 2021 Theodor Voiosu et al., published by Sciendo.
References
REFERENCES
-
- 1. FERREIRA A., CRAVO M., SEDATION IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY: WHERE ARE WE AT IN 2014?. WORLD J GASTROINTEST ENDOSC. 2015;7(2):102–109.
-
- 2. GROSS J., BAILEY P., CONNIS R., COTE C., ZUCCARO G., et al., Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1004–17.
-
- 3. FAIGEL D., BARON T., GOLDSTEIN J., et al., Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002;56:613–7.
-
- 4. SPOREA I., POPESCU A., SANDESC D., BEDREAG O., ASAI R., SIRLI R., ET AL., COLONOSCOPY AND SEDATION IN ROMANIA: EARLY EXPERIENCE USING A BALANCED PROPOFOL REGIMEN. J GASTROINTESTIN LIVER DIS. 2010;19(1):27–3.
-
- 5. BATAGA S., TANŢĂU M., CRISTIAN G., STANCIU C., CONSTANTINESCU G., MULDER CJ., ET AL., ERCP IN ROMANIA IN 2006; A NATIONAL PROGRAMME SEEMS MANDATORY. J GASTROINTEST LIVER DIS. 2007;16(4):431–5.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
