Is Arthroscopic Disk Repositioning Equally Efficacious to Open Disk Repositioning? A Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose: Temporomandibular joint disc repositioning surgery is 1 of the treatment modalities used for treating anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. The procedure can be arthroscopic disc repositioning or open disc repositioning. This systematic review measured and compared the efficacy of arthroscopic and open disc repositioning procedures.

Materials and methods: The authors conducted a systematic review without meta-analysis by performing a literature search electronically and manually covering arthroscopic and open disc repositioning studies published up to July 2020 in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Surgical outcomes such as changes in maximal incisal opening (MIO) and pain scores, temporomandibular joint noises, diet consistency, malocclusion, and postoperative complications were extracted and analyzed.

Results: A total of 28 studies were included in the review and split into those assessing open disc repositioning (n = 13) and those assessing arthroscopic disc repositioning (n = 15). The average age of the study patients in the included studies was 31.5 ± 6.8 years, and women represented 83.3% of the study population. Both arthroscopic and open disc repositioning showed to be efficacious in reducing pain and increasing MIO. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and data reporting between the studies, no quantitative analysis was performed, and the groups were not directly compared.

Conclusions: Both arthroscopic and open disc repositioning led to significant improvements in clinical outcomes based on pain scores and MIO. This study highlights the need for comparative studies of the 2 techniques with well-documented case selection including standardized diagnosis based on Wilkes stages and rigorous outcomes assessment including patient reported outcomes.