Viability of SARS-CoV-2 in river water and wastewater at different temperatures and solids content

Abstract

COVID-19 patients can excrete viable SARS-CoV-2 virus via urine and faeces, which has raised concerns over the possibility of COVID-19 transmission via aerosolized contaminated water or via the faecal-oral route. These concerns are especially exacerbated in many low- and middle-income countries, where untreated sewage is frequently discharged to surface waters. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in river water (RW) and raw wastewater (WW) samples. However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 viability in these environmental matrices. Determining the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water under different environmental conditions is of great importance for basic assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). In this study, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using plaque assays following spiking of RW and WW samples with infectious SARS-CoV-2 that was previously isolated from a COVID-19 patient. These assays were carried out on autoclaved RW and WW samples, filtered (0.22 µm) and unfiltered, at 4 °C and 24 °C. Linear and nonlinear regression models were adjusted to the data. The Weibull regression model achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and was hence chosen to estimate T₉₀ and T₉₉ (time required for 1 log and 2 log reductions, respectively). SARS-CoV-2 remained viable longer in filtered compared with unfiltered samples. RW and WW showed T₉₀ values of 1.9 and 1.2 day and T₉₉ values of 6.4 and 4.0 days, respectively. When samples were filtered through 0.22 µm pore size membranes, T₉₀ values increased to 3.3 and 1.5 days, and T₉₉ increased to 8.5 and 4.5 days, for RW and WW samples, respectively. Remarkable increases in SARS-CoV-2 persistence were observed in assays at 4 °C, which showed T₉₀ values of 7.7 and 5.5 days, and T₉₉ values of 18.7 and 17.5 days for RW and WW, respectively. These results highlight the variability of SARS-CoV-2 persistence in water and wastewater matrices and can be highly relevant to efforts aimed at quantifying water-related risks, which could be valuable for understanding and controlling the pandemic.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; persistence; temperature; viability; wastewater; water.

Graphical abstract

Fig. 1

Log-linear and nonlinear regressions for A) river water (RW-24°C); B) filtered river water (RWF-24°C); C) river water at 4 °C (RW-4°C); D) wastewater (WW-24°C); E) filtered wastewater (WWF-24°C); F) wastewater at 4 °C (WW-4°C). Log-linear model (red), exponential-nls model (blue), exp-biphasic model (green), Weibull model (purple), Gompertz model (orange).